The Project
A documentary series, 7 years in the making, exploring all aspects of male-female relations from a man’s point-of-view. Looks at the various reasons behind the negative treatment of men in Western society, including the root cause: Feminism.
Consists of 49 short films on Feminism, Misandry, Equality, Domestic Violence and Education as well as Family issues like Paternity Fraud, Fatherlessness and Reproductive Rights.
Notes on the video
All films in the Video section are encoded as follows:
Standard video: 320×240 – 12.5fps – video bitrate 400kb/s – audio bitrate 96kb/s
You can, of course, maximise to full screen for larger viewing.
Let me know of any issues with playback.
Delivering these films via the web was not the original plan (indeed it was a very late decision in the process) and so the content has only been minimally optimised for online delivery. Web delivery rate is typically 12 frames per second (as opposed to DVD’s 25 fps for PAL or 29 for NTSC) and this means that care has to be taken with action clips and cuts, care that, unfortunately, has not been factored fully in to these films.
The result is that some scenes and transitions are less-than-fluid and the overall video quality is not as high as would have been the case with earlier planning for web delivery. I hope that these problems do not detract too much from the watch-ability of the films.
Time-allowing, it is possible that I will re-edit parts of the documentary in future to improve web-performance.
Update: Work is now underway to re-edit the documentary in order to make most of it accessible on the site without login. Check back to the site for updates.
Restrictions on viewers
Update: The full, uncut documentary series is now no longer available. There have been many requests to view this content and so this is to assure those interested that the films are in the process of being re-edited for public viewing and will be (almost!) as comprehensive as the originals.
These will be posted on YouTube and in Video in due course.
Beware!
Please read ALL of the following in this warning item.
No film is an island
It is very important if you want to take anything useful from these films that you beware of taking individual films in isolation. The reason for this is that these films are not politically correct in the slightest – they say things as they are (or at least as I have found them to be) and this type of film is simply not to be found on mainstream TV or cable or whatever.
The reason you won’t find anything like it is that TV and the film industry is “feminised” – this means that virtually all programming is essentially female-oriented such that it will appeal to women by telling them how great they are and how much they suffer at the hands of men. The reasons for this are covered in the films and elsewhere on this site, but it’s essentially “all about the Benjamins”. It has been like this for decades and there is no reason for it to change.
As a result of years of feminised programming, any film like the ones found here will be a bit like a bucket of cold water in the face in terms of the presentation of what I see as basic reality. Many people will not be used to this degree of forthrightness and honesty and some may be a little shocked.
Some films are very strong indeed with certain ideas being presented that will quite possibly cause offence to many individuals – particularly Feminist women – but in the context of other films in the project, they represent measured and necessary discussion, rather than purposeless disparagement.
The bottom line is that my advice is to watch a variety of films from different sections before coming to too many judgements because an individual film may focus on a very particular aspect of a larger topic and may be misleading about my intentions as a result.
See Recommended viewing below.
The intended audience
These films were made for a male audience. They are about men, the treatment of men, the psychology of men, the experiences of men and the greatness of men. They are about a view of men and a focus on men that is simply not present in any mainstream media because men essentially do not exist in the media except as criminals. Women are actually quite incidental to the purpose of the films and women are not part of the intended audience.
However, women are free to view whatever they like but they should bear this in mind: this is not TV or the latest Hollywood film. In here, women are not catered to or pampered or put on a pedestal. There are no “strong women”, women are not tough yet feminine and they are not beautiful and accomplished technical geniuses who leave men floundering in their wake with their superior driving and emotional multi-tasking.
In these films, women are presented as I have found them to be after 7 years of dedicated research as well as a lifetime of normal experience. Some of it good, some of it bad, pretty much the same as men, actually. With the difference that women see themselves as virtuous and superior and have hitched their wagon to Feminism in the pursuit of selfish self-interest and then dressed it up as a search for equality which few women I have ever met have truly demonstrated they want.
Women have allied themselves with Feminism in full knowledge of the negative and oppressive consequences for men and in unforgivable ignorance of the negative consequences for themselves, children and family.
By allying themselves with Feminism, women have effectively made a deal with the Devil. If it were only Feminist women that were suffering the consequences of such a pact, maybe it wouldn’t matter and I certainly wouldn’t care. But when they drag everyone else down with them, it prompts a project like manwomanmyth.com.
To any woman that still wants to watch after reading this, please remember I told you so…
Recommended viewing
The following recommendations are a selection of films that should give you an idea of the scope and effects of misandry and Feminism in our society. It is probably not possible to take, let’s say, 1 film from each section and tell you that this is what it’s all about. The project started out as an idea for one 90 minute documentary that has turned into a 15 hour set of much smaller films.
So the suggestions below are exactly that, suggestions for viewing which may or may not give you the full idea of things (but they hopefully will) and they represent some of the films that mean the most to me.
| # | Film | Duration | Synopsis |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Introduction | 03m 47s | How this video project got started. The influences and experiences that led me to spend 7 years looking into the treatment of men and women in western society. Outlines how I first became interested in male female relations, Feminism and misandry: Wimbledon tennis and the Krypton Factor TV series. |
| 03 | FEMINISM - Origins of Feminism | 28m 54s | More details on where Feminism came from and how it significantly pre-dates the 1960's. How radical Feminism attached itself to true Feminism such that they became one combined ideology. How women have been fooled by Feminism and how it has been used to steadily dismantle family. • Leaders of the women's movement • Making the personal, political • Feminism use of Domestic Violence to generate income • Women in the Second World War • The EOC (now called EHRC) |
| 06 | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE - The Battered Woman | 16m 47s | Covers the invention of Battered Woman Syndrome by Lenore Walker and its misuse as a legal defence when women murder their husbands. Includes the Deepak Ahluwalia story, a man murdered while he slept by his wife Kiranjit Ahluwalia using a substance similar to Napalm. • What exactly is a “battering”? • Attempts to change UK law to allow pre-meditated murder by women • The “cycle of abuse” • Media coverage of DV |
| 10 | DOMESTIC VIOLENCE - 1 in 4 Women | 45m 06s | An analysis of the most commonly cited statistic in the domestic violence roadshow – “1 in 4 women experience domestic violence in their lifetimes” . Looks at the way DV has been made into a gender issue when this is demonstrably false and the reasons men are wrongly and deliberately singled out for blame. • The inflation of DV figures • DV and the link with personality disorders • False beliefs about the nature of DV and women’s role in its occurrence • Charities cynical bias towards women in the pursuit of income • How Feminists use the issue of DV to generate income for their campaign against men • Police handling of DV incidents • Brief look at rape statistics |
| 18 | FAMILY - Child Abuse 1 | 31m 53s | Exploration of child abuse – particularly physical and sexual – in the media and wider society. How men are singled out for blame and hysteria about abuse in the news. • The taboo subject of female sexual abuse of children • Typical image of a paedophile • NSPCC attacks on men • False accusations of sexual abuse made by women against men • Double-standard in reporting of sexual abuse and the application of law • The prevalence of abuse committed by mothers compared with fathers • Child abuse in the womb from mothers’ drinking, smoking and drug-taking • Post-natal depression and it’s effects on men as well as women |
| 23 | FAMILY - Reproductive Rights | 39m 18s | Outlines some radical ideas concerning responsibility for pregnancy and childbirth and the lack of options and rights open to men with respect to controlling their fertility. Looks at how the lack of choice available to men leads to family breakdown. • Women and the contraceptive pill • Male pill and it’s impact on men’s rights • Fathers duped into fatherhood • “Casual sex into Cashflow sex” (Amy Alkon) • Single mothers and choices |
| 27 | EDUCATION - Secondary School | 16m 19s | The next stage in the attack on men in education; how secondary school continues the campaign to force boys out of education. Looks at how the curriculum has been modified to remove all elements that improve boys’ performance and the reaction from Feminists on discussion of male intellectual strengths. • Harvard President Larry Summers on boys’ innate abilities • What do women bring to science? • Double-standards in the discussion of genetic abilities • How many female computing teachers could recognise a ZX81? • Why are women being excessively encouraged into technical careers? |
| 29 | EDUCATION - Conclusion | 12m 49s | Looks at the consequences of feminised education, not just for men, but for wider society and the future progress of humanity. • Exam results and what they really mean in today’s education system • Men and competition • Coursework versus Exams • Why girls don’t study physics |
| 31 | EQUALITY - Suffrage | 10m 11s | Explores the history of voting in England including the Reform Acts of parliament. Examines the mythology built up around women’s suffrage and the inaccurate a view most people seem to have about the facts of people’s voting rights. • Women living in a “climate of fear” • The suppression of men’s views • Discrimination in Pension rights for men and women |
| 32 | EQUALITY - War | 33m 02s | Explores men’s incalculable sacrifice in wars past and present and how modern-day society attempts to elevate female sacrifice to the same level. • In history, how many women have demanded the equal right to conscription? • The nobility of men and why men fight for us all • Men in World War 1 and 2 • Women in the military and affirmative action • Women’s cowardice • International Violence Against Women Day • Women’s love of diamonds the death’s of men that result |
| 35 | EQUALITY - The Pay Gap | 31m 51s | Looks at the standard views of the gender pay gap and discusses pay gaps that should exist but don’t in certain jobs like the police and the fire service. • Choices of work • Motherhood and pay • Emergency services and the military • The pay gap and women’s vote • Should a man who can carry 2 bricks be paid more than a woman who can only carry 1 brick? • Which sex is more motivated to earn more? • Can a man choose not to work? Can a woman? |
| 40 | MISANDRY - Introduction – Men Don't Exist | 08m 52s | Introducing the never used word “misandry”, defined as the “hatred of men” and the equivalent of “misogyny” (the difference being that we’ve all heard of misogyny). Examines the negative associations that are made when the word “men” is used in the media and how the deaths of men are hidden in reporting. • Why is it always “Women and children” and never “men and children”? |
| 42 | MISANDRY - Men are Disposable | 38m 50s | Analysis of the low value society holds for men and explores the killing and mutilation of men on our film and television screens. Also looks into the high male suicide rate and the lack of protection men have in society due to their perceived invulnerability and worthlessness. • Noam Chomsky and Worthy and unworthy victims • Men are not a group • Sexual violence against men and boys in entertainment • The psychology of men • Men and Muslims - the backlash against men due to misandry • “Crimestoppers” website and misandry • Who are more vulnerable on our streets – men or women? • Chivalry |
| 46 | MISANDRY - Rape | 43m 53s | Looks into the phenomenon of rape and its perpetrators – men and women. Focuses on false allegations of rape and the consequences of allowing anonymity for women accusers but not for the men accused. • Women –in-danger • Date rape, drug rape and drunk rape • Women’s fascination with rape and abuse • Is it true that 95% of women have been sexually abused? • The Home Office British crime survey and inflated rape statistics • Why would a woman lie about rape? • Spousal rape • What rape is not • The rape of men • Female rapists and double standards • Personality disorder and rape • How risky is it for a man to be alone with a woman in a lift? |
| 49 | Conclusion | xxm xxs | Overall conclusion to the documentary series. Still in production. |
Principal Interviewees
Angry Harry
Psychologist and prominent Men’s Rights activist, angryharry.com.
Erin Pizzey
Author and Domestic Violence expert. Opened the world’s first domestic violence shelter in London and is a patron of the Mankind Initiative Men’s Charity. Author of the book “Prone to Violence”.
Stephen Fitzgerald
Former Director and National Organiser of the Mankind Initiative Men’s Charity.
Michele Elliott
Founder and Director of Kidscape, a children’s charity, and author of the book “Female Sexual Abuse of Children”.
Oliver Curry
Evolutionary Psychologist at the London School of Economics and contributing author to Demos, the independent think tank and research institute.
Professor Colin Francome
Professor Emeritus of Medical Sociology, Middlesex University. Author of the book “Improving Men’s Health”.
After many years of MRA work including making a dozen podcasts, and labouring without a decent internet connection, I now have broadband.
This whole series is on my ‘high priority’ list to watch and learn from.
You have done a magnificent job and I stand in awe.
“You have done a magnificent job and I stand in awe.”
Ditto !!
You have to make these videos more widely available.
Take advantage of Bittorrent: Put together a torrent and upload it. Have it spread around the world. The entire collection in a torrent would be downloaded billions of times.
It’s one of the most effective means of distribution, given that the online downloading community is largely male – and young – and they desperately need to be reached.
With regard to abuse, sexual or any other kind, it is perhaps worth noting that many, if not all the so-called experts refer to people who have been abused as ‘victims’. It’s a clever bit of emotional blackmail and is not questioned.
However, in any other sphere of life, if tragedy occurs, people are not considered as ‘victims’, they are thought of as ‘survivors’. People who ‘survive’ possess a degree of dignity that can only be brought out through suffering, and for this they are treated with respect. One can only be a victim is one is dead but this subtlety has been neglected.
Why then, does Society perceive those who have been abused, differently? The child abuse ‘experts’ have fostered this misconception for many years – and no doubt, it helps their ‘popularity’.
——-
With regard to ‘Dr’ Michele Elliott.
1) It is almost certainly the case that this is an honorary title only, yet Ms Elliott allows people to think otherwise, thereby encouraging public misconceptions about herself.
2) In her non-fiction book, referring to an incident in 1968, Ms Elliott states that ‘nothing’ could have prepared her for discovering that her ‘bank’s manager’ had been guilty of abusing someone who then confided in her.
Q How can this be, given Ms Elliott’s credentials, supposedly those of a child psychologist? Presumably, she would have had to have studied psychology, and therefore been prepared to some extent, in order to be able to lay claim to being a ‘child psychologist’? Yet there is no verifiable record of Ms Elliott’s credentials, to support this.
One might expect that the founder of a charity dealing with the abuse of children would have gone some way to reassure people by telling them exactly what are her credentials but there is no mention of them on the Kidscape website, or anywhere else.
Q What can be ascertained in that Ms Elliott studied at Dixie High in St Petersbury, Florida in the early to mid 1960′s. This is a college for gifted students that deals with the arts, particularly music. Newspapers from the time can sometimes be found online that state that Ms Elliott (maiden name used then) won such and such an award for music. The school makes no mention of psychology. So why does Ms Elliott refer to herself as a psychologist, if she studied music?
This would at least help explain her apparent surprise at being told in 1968 that someone she knew was being abused. It would also help explain her apparent lack of understanding of the human psyche and how it deals with suffering, that it is mostly in a positive way.
Q Why the rather odd manner of referring to her ‘bank manager’? Why make a point of referring to this person as her ‘bank’s manager’ rather than her ‘bank manager’? A minute subtlety perhaps – but why deliberately refer to someone in such an unusual manner?
3) In some of the literature that can be found online, Ms Elliott says, by way of justification for setting up Kidscape, that she was ‘appalled’ at some of the things she saw happening to children at the time.
This might make more sense if Ms Elliott was teaching in a State school here in the UK but she wasn’t. For many years, she taught (subject not known) at the American School in London, so was not subjected to the same scrutiny or disciplines as British children in State schools.
So, to be concerned about the behaviour of children towards each other, who was she referring to? We are led to believe that it is children generally who were being unkind to each other, or being abused – but how would she have knowledge of the UK State school system if she was working in an American School? If children were being unkind to each other at the American School, why then set up Kidscape by way of response?
4) Again, in some online literature that one can find occasionally online, Ms Elliott states that ‘you have to fight for your kids, as no-one else will’.
Q Why fight for your kids at all? Should they not be taught how to stand up for themselves, rather than have their mother fighting for them?
5) A couple of years ago, (year can be verified in Kidscape’s yearly submission to Charity Commission), Kidscape accepted a £100,000 gift from Labour DfSF. This donation was not mentioned on the Kidscape website when smaller, less ‘politicale’ donations were.
There is something that doesn’t quite add up with Michele Elliott. Given her penchant to mislead; and for her public vilification of some men who abuse children publicly, her behaviour is reminiscent of the Ku Klux Klan of 1960′s America, with similarities between the way people of colour were targetted, sinply for being the ‘wrong’ colour.
The KKK originally started as a Womens’ KKK, in Wild West America, to help the women feel who joined feel protected from the unwanted sexual attentions of some men.
Over subsequent years, the Women’s KKK evolved into the KKK of more recent times; with the Women’s branch veering into what became the Feminist Movement.
“The KKK originally started as a Womens’ KKK, in Wild West America, to help the women feel who joined feel protected from the unwanted sexual attentions of some men.
Over subsequent years, the Women’s KKK evolved into the KKK of more recent times; with the Women’s branch veering into what became the Feminist Movement.”
Here you articulate a conclusion that I have been arriving at independently. Feminism is absolutely the modern Ku Klux Klan, in word and in deed. The racism both institutional and social, the bigotry, the eugenics, the hate, the segregation, the lynching, the Jim Crow laws. It is all there. How could it come to this?