An outline of some of the terms and acronyms used within this site.
- Misandry
- Misandrist
- Andrology
- Feminism
- Radical Feminism
- Female-supremacism
- The FEMPLEX
- MRA
- MRM
- Patriarchy
- Matriarchy
- The Duluth Model
- Organisms
- Toxic Women
- The Male Condition
- False Rape Culture
- White Knight
- Tough Women
- Technical Women
- Worthless Women
- Irresponsible Mother
- Zeta Male
- Forced Fatherhood
- Paternity Fraud
- Vagina Syndrome – VS
- Feckless Female
- Feral Female
- Sick Older Women – SOWs
- Paedomums (Pedomoms)
- Fequality
- NAWALT
- NAFALT
- Femedia
- Super Bowl Hoax
- Herstory
- For the Muslims – FTM
- Coven
- Mangina
- Female-Centrism
- Pay Per View
- He-woman
- Jail bait
- Potential False Accuser – PFA
- Harridan Harman
- The Labia Party
- Childline
- NSPCC
- Child Protection
- WomenBall
- Feministed
- Back-Story
- Primitives in Pantsuits (PIPs)
- Prime Mangina
- Feducation
- Gynocentrism
- Feminist
- Earnest Feminist
- Radical Feminist
- Shaming Language
- The Pussy Pass
- Glass Ceiling
- Glass Cellar
- Pay Gap
- Male Chauvinism
- Hypergamy
- Red Pill
- Blue Pill
- Chivalry
- MHRM
- Comments (26)
Misandry
Defined as “the hatred of men”.
In Western society, misandry is part of the fabric of daily life and can be seen virtually everywhere – in politics, health, education and media.
The deaths of men are disguised by their job titles; the health of men is under-resourced in favour of resourcing women’s health; the vastly larger suicide and homeless rates for men are not addressed by government; men are deemed automatically bad and women automatically good in the Marxist sense; men are deemed as inherently dangerous particularity around children and women; men’s suffering and pain is belittled, laughed-at and dismissed; men are increasingly becoming second-class citizens; men have unequal protection under the law and their suffering is allowed and actually encouraged; men are forcefully separated from their children; men are being forced out of the education system; the list goes on and on and is growing and deepening at a frightening pace.
However the size, scale and commonality of misandry is such, that it has become hidden in plain view.
Men are bad, bad, bad
0m 42s
More info on here, here, here and here.
Misandrist
One who practices misandry. Feminists are the prime examples of misandrists.
Andrology
The medical science of male health, concerning diseases and functions unique to men. Counterpart to gynaecology.
Feminism
Feminism is the project for increasing the power of women. With no end point. Indefinitely. Forever.
Feminism is the (generally) acceptable face of female-supremacism and is the primary cause for the prevalence of misandry.
Feminism is the modern packaging of Gynocentrism, an ancient product, made possible in its present form by the extensive public welfare arrangements of the post-war period.
(credit: Gynocentrism Theory)
Also:
An ideology that is essentially about forcefully encouraging women into the workplace with the false dichotomy that if women are not working, then they are oppressed by men. Additionally, Feminism at it’s root, is based on the false premise that: “men have things good at the expense of women, who have things bad”. All supposed types of Feminism have this fallacy as their foundation and it follows that all forms of Feminism are therefore flawed in the same way.
The methods used to do this are numerous but are generally focused on convincing women of their superiority to men and insisting that women have always lived under the shadow of patriarchy. During the 1960′s, Feminism became forcefully joined with Radical Feminism (see below) to become the version of Feminism that persists today.
Radical Feminism
This version of Feminism was started by women who simply hated men. These women (mostly lesbians, incidentally) wanted men dis-empowered and some wanted Gendercide (the elimination of men). They saw the unique potential of Feminism as a means to bring ordinary women into their ranks and effectively enveloped it, wrapping it up in misandry and creating the Feminism we are burdened with today.
Many women today who call themselves Feminists are semi-ignorant of the far-reaching hatred embodied in the term, but a great many are not ignorant and support it regardless. Women will often blindly assert that it is to do with ‘equality’ and ‘fairness’ when in reality, the ideology is based solely on misandry.
Female-supremacism
The idea that women are superior to men and deserve to be the ruling class.
Female-supremacism is the hidden part of Feminism and is best described as Feminism’s core belief.
The FEMPLEX
The integrated complex of sociopolitical operation supporting the twin interests of female-supremacism and women’s advocacy. This term was coined to better encompass the breadth of Feminism where simply using the term ‘Feminism’ is a) not comprehensive enough; b) too vague.
This term is partly founded on the idea that Feminism is a subset of female-supremacism and represents the acceptable face of the hate movement.
Derived from : “The Feminisitical Operations Complex” (FEMinisitical Operations ComPLEX). Akin to the ‘military industrial complex‘.
(Credit: Fidelbogen, relevant video here)
MRA
Men’s Rights Activist (also Men’s Rights Advocate, Male Renaissance Agitator). Any man (or woman, I suppose) who is aware of misandry in our society and takes steps to remedy it.
MRM
Also MM – Men’s Movement.
Men’s Rights Movement. Principally, the body of men and opinion furthering the cause of men’s basic human rights.
Patriarchy
The commonly held idea that men rule the world with all institutions run by men and for the good of men. Covered and debunked in Film 30 – Equality: Patriarchy.
Matriarchy
The more probable model for western societies where females are regarded as the more worthy sex and are in complete control of reproduction and consume the most resources. Most things are run by men for the good of women.
The Duluth Model
The idea is that society is male dominated and men use their power in various ways including being violent to women. The model asserts that all men are like this due to the relative positions of men and women in society. Essentially, men are born into a world where they automatically become oppressors of women and women are born into oppression by men. Yes, it’s as black and white as that and as wilfully ignorant as that and yet it heavily informs policy on domestic violence to this day.
The Duluth “wheel” model is applied in virtually all training regarding domestic violence, police practice and therapy methods, and is utilised in the creation of government policy on domestic violence and so it negatively affects every man’s status in law.
Organisms
The idea that concepts within biology can be applied to explain the behaviour of agencies such as government, large charites and businesses. Organisations have an existence and a powerful need to survive and grow over and above any existence they have to serve people. Once an organisation – an organism – exists, it fights to survive and competes for resources with other organisations in a very similar way to the way living creatures behave.
For example, the US Presidency. If the sitting President were to disappear tomorrow, the Presidency itself would remain in full effect, unchanged except with a different individual at the helm.
Once an organisation exists, it begins to serve itself before all other things, and it is important that we appreciate this. The head of a political party must serve their party before their country or they will never rise to be head of the party. The same thing applies to almost all other organisations.
By utilising our knowledge of what motivates animals and human beings, we can better model the motivations and actions of large organisations and better understand their true agendas.
(Credit: Angry Harry)
Toxic Women
A woman is Toxic if she has embraced Feminism and lives according to it’s tenets of complete selfishness and irresponsibility for women. The Toxic woman is very common and shows no signs of dying out. Indeed, Toxic women significantly outnumber non-Toxic women.
The Toxic woman thinks it is fine to strip a man of assets on divorce, fine to deny him access to his own children because it’s what she wants, it’s ok to sue her own employer or colleagues because she feels oppressed in some way, it’s the right thing to do to accuse a man of rape if he doesn’t cuddle her in the morning, it is justified for her to take jobs in the fire service, the police or the military and receive the same pay as men without having anything like the same ability or taking anything like the same risk.
It is not safe for a man to be alone with the Toxic woman and nor is it safe for him to drive her home or pay her a compliment – false accusations are ready to be flung by the toxic woman who tends to have one of a range of personality disorders.
The Toxic woman should not be dated, stood next to, employed or interacted with in any way by a man wishing to avoid enormous problems in his life. (Article here)
The Male Condition
My description for a patchwork of liabilities in the thoughts and actions of many men that enables misandry to flourish. It contains, but is not limited to:
- Accepts that criminal behaviour from a minority of men is representative of men in general e.g. ‘Men can stop rape’
- Walks a ‘mile in her shoes’ even though she wouldn’t walk a single step in his (not that it would occur to him to ask her)
- Capitulates to any and every Feminist demand believing that it represents what women want
- Has no conception that the ‘other men‘ and ‘bad men’ women malign, also includes himself
- Has no concept of solidarity with other men
- Does not see himself as part of the group ‘men’, but rather sees himself by his occupation or as a ‘gamer’ etc
- To acknowledge misandry is an admission of weakness
- Minimises and rationalises his own pain and any other man’s suffering as unimportant
- Makes excuses for misandry and those who promote it
- Women first
- Women are the fairer sex
- Women are better than men
- Competition for female attention
- Girls are made of “sugar and spice”
- Under-developed sense of self and his own psychology
- Low self-esteem, low self-respect and low sense of self-worth
- Sees his own needs as secondary to everyone else’s, particularly women
- Sees himself as an unpaid bodyguard to any and all women (Hero, from the Greek serow = protector-slave)
False Rape Culture
A counterpoint to the the unsupportable idea that women live in a “Rape Culture”. False Rape Culture is of far greater validity in the simple fact that while we readily destroy a man’s life on the say so of a false accuser, we do not punish the false accuser adequately and in fact, rarely punish her at all. Further, whereas the crime of rape is regarded to be of essentially equal seriousness to murder in our society, false rape accusations are indefensibly regarded as far less serious.
The complete destruction of reputation, career, family and even the life of men is regarded as being of little importance and therefore, times are good for the false accuser (credit: Paul Elam, A Voice for Men)
False allegations, prevalence and consequences
07m 54s
(clip from Rape)
White Knight
A man spoon-fed on chivalry and who firmly (and naively) believes in the moral superiority of women over men and so holds women on a pedestal.
As Feminism has made most women toxic and woefully undeserving of chivalry, the White Knight is a sad, although common anachronism. In metaphorically rescuing damsels in distress and in putting women first, he receives nothing but contempt in return.
A White Knight:
- Believes that women are superior to men and simultaneously believes that women need protection like children
- Will rescue a woman first over a man simply because she’s female
- Believes in “women first” in everything
- Will risk his life for a stranger if she’s a woman, but would not do the same for a man
- Will spring to the defence of any woman even if she is in the wrong
- Will fight other men to defend a woman’s honour, even if she has none
- Believes that his own life is worth less than the life of any female, anywhere
- Et al
See also Mangina and a video about the Hudson river air crash: women and children first, but why?
Tough Women
This identifies the unfeasibly tough female characters that Hollywood in particular seems hell-bent on inserting into films, typically action films.
They are not only tough, they are super-tough and typically tougher than most men in the film. They are virtually always shown to outdo, outperform or out-tough a man at some point in the action. See Misogyny 1
Technical Women
The equivalent of Tough Women but in technical areas. These women are presented by Hollywood as technical geniuses who leave men floundering in their wake particularly in the field of computing. See Misogyny 1
Worthless Women
This is the implausible situation presented in film where the love interest of the male hero is not a woman that any sensible man would generally regard as a good or worthwhile woman to pursue.
In other words, a woman of low appeal to a man when it comes to a serious relationship (prostitute, unfaithful, deeply selfish, uncaring, drug addicted, violent, spiteful etc), and women with little to no redeeming qualities are miraculously portrayed as the apple of our hero’s eye. It counts as Hollywood’s valiant attempt to make the typical modern Feminist worthless woman, worthy of a man’s best efforts to woo, when the truth is that Western women have become largely toxic.
Irresponsible Mother
Description covering various misbehaviours by women who choose to become mothers in poor circumstances, without a willing father or else behave criminally (or in ways that should be classed as criminal) while pregnant or as mothers.
For example, smoking, drinking alcohol and drug-taking whilst pregnant; failing to breastfeed for no other reason than lifestyle choice; choosing to conceive in full knowledge that the father does not want or is not ready for children; choosing to be single mothers. See Irresponsible Mothers
How irresponsible is she?
04m 09s
(clip from Irresponsible Mothers)
Zeta Male
Counter point to the Alpha Male and Beta Male paradigms (which have a degree of validity but are closely tied to women’s opinions, needs and wants). The Zeta Male defines his masculinity according to his own rules, quite separate from his relation to women.
MGTOW (Men Going their own way) are generally examples of Zeta Males, but more and more men who might not identify with that philosophy are displaying Zeta Male tendencies due to the toxicity of Feminist women. It is self-defence for men in a period in history when manhood itself is under assault from a number of directions.
(credit: Paul Elam, A Voice for Men)
Forced Fatherhood
Where a man does not choose when and with whom he has children, sadly, the current situation for the majority of men in the post-contraceptive pill world.
I would hazard that most men in the western world do not choose when they become fathers, the decision is made for them by women. This is a leading cause of fatherlessness as the man is effectively enslaved and will often seek to resist that enslavement.
Paternity Fraud
A known and generally understood term but one massively underused when considering the high prevalence of this crime (average 10% of children but ranging from 1% in high income areas to as much as 30% in poor areas – See Paternity Fraud). Usage is often softened with euphemism e.g. misattributed fatherhood as if the woman made a simple minor error that time she duped a man into devoting his life into raising a child he thinks is his, but is not.
Paternity Fraud is an evil and ongoing crime against men
03m 35s
(Clip from Paternity Fraud)
The fact is, a woman who does this invalidates a man’s life and biological future, potentially stripping him of his life’s ambition. Such a woman is an evil, toxic criminal and there are no excuses for such utterly reprehensible behaviour. Paternity Fraud should be a crime punishable with significant prison time. But of course, because the perpetrators are female, paternity fraud is not actually considered a crime at all.
An argument against paternity fraud being “that big a deal” is that when a man finds out it’s been committed against him, it shouldn’t really matter because he’s still a father to the child, just not biologically linked. Really? Fine, then when women give birth in hospital, let the nurses swap all the babies around so that the mother has no idea if the baby she takes home is hers or not. It doesn’t matter if it’s her baby because she’ll still be a mother to the child, right?
Vagina Syndrome – VS
Similar to the pussy pass but is a collective name describing how women have a syndrome to explain their every criminal act and most other misbehaviour.
A syndrome for every crime
00m 55s
(clip from Child Abuse)
Feckless Female
Where a woman is fully aware that a man has had several children with several other women but decides to have a child with him anyway. The woman and society at large, then blames the man for being irresponsible. You couldn’t make this stuff up. Counterpoint to Feckless Fathers. See Irresponsible Mothers
Feral Female
A woman so sullied with the toxicity of Feminist thought, so toxic and so thoroughly removed from common decency towards men, that she has become essentially, bestial. Harridan Harman is a good example of this sort of woman.
Sick Older Women – SOWs
AKA known as cougars. Older women who prey on (ideally for them) teenage boys as their sexual fantasy and yet are applauded for it in our culture. If men the same age were to display such lust for teenage girls the police would be arresting them for sexual predation. Gotta love equality.
Paedomums (Pedomoms)
Description for mothers who sexually abuse their children, a highly prevalent crime particularly in single mother households. See Child Abuse.
Introducing the Female Paedophile
11m 32s
(clip from Child Abuse)
Fequality
Also Shequality and Mequality where appropriate.
The permanent state of bias in favour of women in all aspects of our culture as desired by Feminists. The wish for an ongoing state of female entitlement and encouragement at the expense of men and boys that its supporters hope will lead naturally to female supremacy. We are well on the way. (credit: JockeVXO)
NAWALT
Not All Women Are Like That. That near-mythical female creature who is different to the toxic women out there that are the demonstrable cause of many severe problems for men. The problem, is that all women, even the toxic ones, claim to be this rare, halo-wearing creature.
The typical refrain from those (usually women) that use this term, is that all a man has to do to have a happy life and avoid toxic Feminist women, is “choose the right woman”. It doesn’t matter that the game is rigged against men and indeed is the equivalent of a minefield for men, no, men just need to be careful and wise and he will be fine. That’s like having a law that says: “Any man that steps foot outside his house after midnight may be shot by the police” and recommending to men that the best way to deal with this situation, is not to try and change such an unfair and dangerous law, but instead, to “carefully choose” what time he goes out.
As I commented on this video:
“The vast majority of women are complicit in their support for Feminism and misandry, despite their awareness of the damage to men and boys.
It’s laughable when people suggest that the system is fine and men need only pick the “right” women in order to avoid the very serious problems a man can easily encounter in our Feminist society. I’m sure these women (and men) would also suggest that men would have fair odds playing Russian Roulette, using a six-shooter loaded with 4 bullets.”
NAFALT
Not All Feminists Are Like That (also NLTOF – Not Like Those Other Feminists). The Feminists who are entirely as hateful in their views as any other Feminist, yet, due to minor ideological distinctions, claim to be somehow different in that they are good, kind, fair, genuine, real, true, first-wave, orphan-loving or halo-wearing Feminists.
See Answering the Tired Feminist Mantra and What’s Equality got to do with it?
Femedia
Feminist media sources, the kind which will only report on matters concerning women. This means virtually all mainstream news sources airing today and most non-mainstream sources as well.
A great number of these news reports make deliberate use of factoids; biased, inflated and even invented statistics; deliberate misinformation;and blatant misandry concerning the plight of women. The Femedia amounts to a plague and it is very difficult to encounter genuine journalism on any topic to do with men and women. The UK BBC is perhaps the greatest exponent of this kind of (mis)reporting.
See Christina Hoff Sommers on Violence Against Women (including analysis of the Domestic Violence industry and the Super Bowl Hoax):
“We’re not talking about a few errors. We’re not talking about occasional lapses. We’re talking about a body of egregiously false information at the heart of the domestic violence movement. False claims are pervasive; false claims are not the exception, they’re the rule.”
- Christina Hoff Sommers, Continuing Distortions about Intimate Partner Abuse
Super Bowl Hoax
Also World Cup Hoax and [insert major sporting event here] Hoax.
The Super Bowl Hoax, which first occurred in 1993, falsely claimed that more women are victims of domestic violence on Super Bowl Sunday than any other day of the year. The public outcry arising from the hoax spurred passage of the Violence Against Women Act the following year. A complete account of the Super Bowl Hoax can be seen here: http://www.snopes.com/crime/statistics/superbowl.asp.
See also, Christina Hoff Sommers on Violence Against Women and false statistics.
Herstory
Feminist counterpart to history and a worrying trend where misinformation is deliberately supplanting the genuine historical record. Whereas history is the factual record of what happened, herstory is the record of how women prefer to see it.
The most classic example of this historical revisionism is the false idea of women’s voting rights oppression i.e. women’s suffrage.
When most men and women couldn’t vote
(yet, strangely, we only hear about the women…)
02m 43s
(clip from Suffrage)
An offshoot of the utterly pointless “Women’s Studies” programme, the achievements and sacrifices of the men around them are minimised in this female narrative and history is magically retold into herstory with a wishful reinterpretation of events and a multitude of historical revisions to make women feel better about their contributions in times past.
The mythical accomplishments of Ada Lovelace is one example, the equally mythical bravery of women on British warships in the 18th Century is another:
Feminists rewrite history
01m 42s
(clip from Winners of Feminism)sy
And it’s not just me saying it! Here is a quote from a Youtube user on one of the documentary films:
“I’m in history at my uni and it is unbelievable how history is being rewritten to make women feel good about their role. Not only is all western history broad-brushstroked as oppressive etc, but literally in my American history class the role of women knitting quilts was being analyzed in the American civil war, instead of men dying.”
Furthermore, we shouldn’t forget that, according to herstoy, the hateful white feather campaign against men didn’t really happen. Women were far too busy being oppressed to be so thoroughly despicable. Surely?
Thoroughly wicked women in history (strangely absent from herstory)
01m 30s
(clip from War)
Further likely effects of herstory:
Please take note of the three predictions that follow, and please remember that you read them here first:
In due course, the text books that we supply to our children in schools, will describe the D-Day landings as: “The men and women who landed on the beaches of Normandy”.
In due course, when the ultimate sacrifice of our soldiers (an overwhelmingly male sacrifice) is being reported, look for some journalist to one day be the first to describe “the brave servicewomen and men who gave their lives”.
In due course, look for the world to remember the revised immortal words of Neil Armstrong as he set foot on the moon: “One small step for a human, one giant leap for humankind”.
Then again, it may be that these predictions have already come true; when it comes to misandry, very little surprises me in our Feminised times.
See also Female-Centrism
For the Muslims – FTM
Feminist women who readily acknowledge that they are treated better than men in the West and that men are officially becoming second-class citizens, yet still choose to be Feminists because they believe that Muslim women are oppressed somewhere in the Middle East.
These same Feminist women could not distinguish Saudi Arabia from Yemen on a map and have never stepped foot in the Middle-East, yet they proclaim deep and certain knowledge of the supposedly awful female experience under Muslim Sharia law. See also Female -Centrism.
Coven
Any gathering of Feminist women where the topic under discussion is how oppressed they are in society. Typical meeting places are Starbucks coffee houses, generally in the middle of the day while their (oppressive) men folk are busy at work.
Mangina
A male Feminist and honorary female. A man who is more female in his world view than most women and on principle, supports female viewpoints on virtually any topic, even when those views detract from his own civil or human rights as a man. See also He-woman
Female-Centrism
As Barry White might croon, the world where women are first, last and everything particularly in news reporting or in analysis of history. A female-centric viewpoint looks at any situation, generally a negative one, only as it affects women, ignoring the fact that those same negative effects may be occurring against men and especially ignoring situations where men experience greater problems than women.
A female –centric news report for example, would be one where the headline reads “50 women raped in war zone” whilst barely mentioning “100 men killed” in the same area at the same time. In history it’s something like “women were denied the vote” whilst failing to acknowledge that most men were also denied the vote during the same period, and further ignoring that at that same time, men who did not have the vote were being conscripted for war whilst women were exempt.
See Suffrage and UK Voting Rights, Women Focus and Men Don’t Exist.
Pay Per View
Child support payments that are in reality, ‘mother-lifestyle-enhancement’ payments that are required to be paid by fathers to allow them access to their non-resident children.
Pay-per-view is the onus placed on non-resident fathers to pay court-mandated child support, far in excess of what a child actually needs and what care of a child actually costs in order to be allowed to see the child for some minimal time of the mother’s choosing. Visitation rights for the father are on a pay-per-view basis.
Paying for time
02m 14s
(clip from Irresponsible Mothers)
He-woman
A man who is so wrapped up in a female-centric world-view that he can no longer see the world as it is and can only see it as it relates to women. Such a man could look upon a man and a woman who have both fallen overboard from a ship and run for help shouting “Woman overboard! Woman overboard!” See also Mangina
Jail bait
Any adult woman under the age of 25 with whom a man might have sex. Yes, that’s the way we’re headed.
Potential False Accuser – PFA
Any toxic woman you date. Or have sex with. Or don’t have sex with. Or don’t call the next day after having sex. Or work with. Or share an elevator with. Or smile at. Or don’t smile at. Et al.
Even weeks or months after a consensual sexual encounter, a man might end up under arrest and on a rape charge if the mood takes her. See Rape
The likelihood of punishment for false accusations is low and what consequences there are, tend to be very mild. Therefore, there is very little to inhibit a toxic female from making false allegations if she feels slighted or is otherwise annoyed with a man, or wishes to gain some advantage such as with accusations against celebrities or to harm a man in divorce and custody cases.
Harridan Harman
also Harriet Harm-men (credit: BobbyL)
A more suitable moniker for our dear Harriet Harman MP, possible the most hateful and influential female supremacist in the UK and Europe and perhaps even beyond. An impressive woman, if that is, you’re impressed by deeply sick individuals.
See Feral Female
The Labia Party
Aka Labour Party, So named here for their near single minded socialist, big government and overwhelmingly Feminist agenda, the huge cost of which which is the principal reason Britain has been so exposed to the financial crisis.
Childline
A children’s helpline run by the NSPCC in the UK. The phone line purports to exist to help children suffering from some sort of abuse from someone (particularly their parents), or any other problem they might face.
In reality, the service exists primarily as a further attack on the structure and purpose of family and counts as an insidious attempt to subvert the relationships between family members. They want children’s first port of call to be them and the state rather than anyone in the family that the child knows. In this way, more funding is generated for the NSPCC business.
NSPCC
A Feminist shakedown outfit posing as an organisation for the “prevention of cruelty to children”.
In reality, this organisation is responsible for perhaps more damage to children and the relationships within families than any other entity now or in history. They deliberately and unfairly target men as abusers of children in an effort to further separate men from children’s lives and thereby, ironically, create a need for the very services they provide.
In other words, they generate lucrative business for themselves by breaking apart families using the principal method of painting all men as potential and indeed likely paedophiles. Due to the enormous amounts of income they generate from the use of children and children’s issues, they count as quite possibly the most toxic anti-family organisation in Britain today.
They seek evermore legislation under the mantra of furthering child protection which is coded language for their deliberate attempts to use children to generate income from the public and the state. They represent little in the way of good purpose and can be regarded as an almost entirely toxic and parasitic business that needs to be exposed for the base, money-making enterprise that it is.
The NSPCC’s hate campaign against men
06m 54s
(clip from Child Abuse)
Child Protection
The warm and fuzzy language used to describe a set of principles and rules mandated to be used by all people and organisations that work with children. The idea is that it is everyone’s responsibility to watch out for children’s welfare to the extent that if you should have any concerns whatsoever about a child you come into contact with, you should report it to your designated child-protection officer.
Such rules and regulations successfully foster an environment of mistrust, finger-pointing and suspicion where it is seen as justified for state workers, the police and NGO’s like the NSPCC to stake dominion over the welfare of children and reduce the role and protection of the family. In this way, we grant ever more power over children to the state and reduce the responsibilities and rights of parents with the justification that it’s for child protection. Who could argue with that?
WomenBall
Also Women-Ball.
A concept that describes how women are the equivalent of a ball in a ball-game i.e. women are like a basketball or football or tennis ball etc. In order to win a game of basketball, for example, the winning team has to get control of the ball, keep possession and score with it. That’s what agencies like the government, media and charities have become adept at doing: getting control of women; forming women’s opinions; satisfying women’s desires. They then proceed to slam dunk over men’s civil rights.
Feminism is simply a means of getting hold of women. Once you have control of women (just like control of the basketball), you control the game. Feminism counts as possibly the all-time greatest play. In my opinion, if men are to succeed in any way in winning back their basic human rights, they have to learn the rules of the game and get control of the ball. They need to learn WomenBall.
More on this in an upcoming article.
Feministed
The typically tragic and hugely negative result after an area of life has been sullied with Feminism. The Education system, for example, has been Feministed. As has the fire service, the police service and the military.
When Feminists choose to target an aspect of life or some activity, when they lay they hands on it and warp it to suit the demands of their insidious doctrine, it has been well and truly Feministed. To the detriment of us all.
Back-Story
Refers to Hollywood’s unwritten rule which commands that men must – if at all possible – be portrayed as the evil-doers in the personal history of any given character.
For example:
- If a character was sexually abused as a child, it was the father that did it.
- If a character was abandoned by a parent, it was the father that left.
- If they were homeless, the father kicked them out.
- If they were beaten by one of their parents, you can bet that it was the father (oh, and did I mention that he beat the mother too? And kicked the family dog? And drowned the goldfish?).
- If the mother is an alcoholic, she was driven to it by her philandering, irresponsible husband/father. Who also beat her. And the kids.
- If a woman is a single mother it’s never her fault , it’s because her husband/boyfriend beat her and she was forced to leave him.
You get the idea. Next time you come across an incidental back-story in a film (or book or TV series), generally evil, generally abusive, you can be virtually assured that the abuser will be male. It’s just easier that way.
Primitives in Pantsuits (PIPs)
(credit: Gynocentrism Theory)
Prime Mangina
An apt term for Britain’s Prime Minister and misandrist-in-chief.
It doesn’t matter who holds the post, they tend to be either philosophically weak in that they bow to Feminist pressure, or else they are even weaker, in that they enthusiastically promote the Feminist agenda.
(credit: Drex)
Feducation
The feminised education system currently in force in western society, that will run our economies into the ground under the weight of feeble-minded (and mostly female) hordes holding degrees in ‘Womens Studies’.
The education environment that is actively hostile to boy students and male teachers and also to the subjects that boys like such as science, mathematics and engineering. It counts as a deliberate, long-term effort to drive all men out of education. Permanently.
Education in video.
(credit: Drex)
Gynocentrism
The paradigm of male sacrifice for the benefit of women. This is the historical norm, and it was the way of the world long before anything called ‘Feminism’ made itself known.
That men should sacrifice themselves utterly – their very essence, their being and their identity, to save women that they do not even know – is neatly encapsulated in that popular phrase, ‘women and children first.’
(And if you’re paying special attention, you will notice that it is never uttered as ‘children and women first.’ The very thought is absurd! This is because what is really meant by the phrase is ‘women first, children second.’)
(credit: Gynocentrism Theory)
Feminist
An adopter of Feminism and therefore a Misandrist, bigot, PIP, female-centrist, gynocentrist and all-round selfish human being who sees the world not in a logical fashion, but in terms of emotions and arbitrary morals.
There are no good Fascists, no good racists and no good Feminists (despite what Feminists will often wail)
Earnest Feminist
A misandrist without the courage of her convictions, a misandrist by inaction, or else a misandrist by virtue of unforgivable ignorance. The earnest Feminist is often well-meaning and serves as a ‘useful idiot‘ to the principal aims of Feminism.
Earnest feminists do not necessarily intend any of the outcomes relished by Radical Feminists, but as they are members of the collective, they will act as members of the collective, and even if they do not participate in the active persecution of men, they will be forbidden – as an unspoken rule – from exhibiting any sympathy at all for men, no matter what they suffer. Those who do are promptly expelled, labelled anti-feminists, and subject to vicious attacks by the in-group. No feminist will stop the process of male elimination, nor will she feel any regret once it is complete, as long as she remains a feminist.
(credit: Gynocentrism Theory)
Radical Feminist
A pure, unadulterated, self-confessed misandrist.
Holocaust is the ultimate utopian vision of some radical feminists, and they are perfectly open about this, discussing the male-free world of the future as insipidly as if they were discussing holiday plans. Other radical feminists imagine a future in which men’s numbers are greatly reduced and the remaining males are kept as slaves. Still others dream of a society similar to ours, but with women in the lead in all spheres of life, with all pretense to equality abandoned.
(credit: Gynocentrism Theory)
Shaming Language
Virtually the only form of argument used by Feminists against valid criticism of their creed. It’s an attempt to control debate about Feminism and avoid substantive discussion by labeling, smearing and falsely characterising the critic.
It involves a deliberate failure to address the issue at hand in any particular argument and instead, amounts to purely ad hominem attacks on the critic in an attempt to ‘shut him up’. Shaming language is used by the Feminist in a pretence of addressing the ‘motives’ of the critic, when the reality is that it’s a desperate ploy to distract from the vacuity of the Feminist position. The various insults and diversions are typically of the form:
- You hate women
- You’re a misogynist
- You have a small penis
- You can’t get laid
- You’re bitter
- Stop whining
- Man Up!
- You have deep-seated resentment of women
- You’re afraid of women
- When did you start hating women?
- et al
The Pussy Pass
The overwhelming tendency within the legal system, the media and government to believe that women are examples of purest innocence in the world and any crime that they commit should not be punished with equal severity to men who commit the same crime. Put more simply, the Pussy Pass is the tendency to grant criminal women leniency in sentencing due to their possession of a vagina and perhaps a nice smile.
It is due to the Pussy Pass that:
- domestic violence committed by women is deemed less serious than that committed by men
- women who kill are somehow forced into it by circumstances or else are suffering from a convenient female-only syndrome, whereas men kill because they’re evil
- women who rape children are not treated as rapists but instead are deemed to have had “affairs” with “young men” who appeared “older than their years” and who “enjoyed the experience”
- women who steal are doing so in desperation or for their families, men who steal are despicable, low-life thieves
- men who commit crimes should be locked up and the keys thrown away, in contrast, women’s prisons shouldn’t even exist
- The list goes on
A recent example of the the Pussy Pass in action, is the reduction in sentence for child rapist Deborah Lefavre on the grounds that “she had blonde hair, blue eyes and a nice figure“.
See also Vagina Syndrome and A Voice for Men.
Glass Ceiling
The largely imaginary invisible barrier faced by women preventing them from ascending into the most senior positions in companies. This barrier is supposedly built, maintained and jealously guarded by chauvinistic males who want to keep women down.
The reality is that whilst glass ceilings of sorts may exist, wherever they are, they are in place for a multitude of reasons and many people might be affected by them for many different reasons. In the case of women, glass ceilings may exist because:
- They took extensive leave to bear and raise children, compared with men who didn’t
- They can’t work out of town for extended periods due to parental responsibilities
- They choose not to work the hours necessary for promotion
- They decide that high power, high stress positions don’t appeal
- They fail to compete with men going for the same positions (e.g. do white sprinters face a glass ceiling, or do certain black sprinters simply run faster than them?)
- They choose to work part-time
- They choose lower paying, less stressful, more pleasant jobs, with fewer promotion prospects
- Et al
Glass Cellar
Also Glass Floor.
Pay Gap
Also Wage Gap.
Male Chauvinism
Hypergamy
Red Pill
A popular term in the men’s movement (particulalry from A Voice for Men) which describes the choice to face and deal with tough and often nasty realities, rather than the easy illusions of life. If you take the Red Pill, you look at the world as it is and not as it is often protrayed by government, the media and by other organisations with various agenda’s. Red Pill men are quite rare and tend towards being Zeta Males. Red Pill women are much rarer, but they do exist
- A Red Pill person does not buy the fallacy that domestic violence is only caused and perpetrated by men
- A Red Pill person questions the factoids they are often presented with on TV (1 in 4 women are raped; 1 in 4 women are abused; 1 in 4 women are decapitated, etc)
- A Red Pill man understands how chivalry is a tool used to oppress him and chooses not to be a White Knight
- A Red Pill man understands that women are not made of sugar and spice and that men are not made of frogs and snails
- Et al
Blue Pill
Chivalry
MHRM
Men’s Human Rights Movement.
Term first published on A Voice for Men on 31 January 2013, as a new descriptor for the men’s rights movement (MRM).























Thank you for your contributions in creating and maintaining this site, and for your cogently argued and well illustrated videos. Some events in my life a few years ago cased the scales to fall from my eyes, revealing the truth of male/female dynamics. Since then I have frequented MRA sites, and have read most commentators from Warren Farrell to Steve Moxon, always in search of “ammunition” to use in exchanges with the many feminists in my acadmic department. Your videos put things in a fresh perspective.
You no doubt have good reasons for wishing to restrict access to many of your videos. If you would consider allowing me to register, I assure you that I would abide by whatever terms you set forth. I thank you for your consideration, whatever you decide.
Thank you for creating such a fine tool. It is a repository that will open a lot of closed eyes and ears. More power to your elbow.
The Toxic Women is a disgrace to Womankind and those women who are honourable, live there life via the values of Openess, Truth and Goodwill. Often these fall into the bracket of those females who are between 0-16 years of age (the age of Innocence) before maniplulation by other Toxic Women or those women between 45-100 usually the mothers’ of Men who believe in values of bringing up their children with morals, a sense of that which is Right or Wrong and always with the emphasis to do good to others, to go out on a limb to help those in need! Then there are woman who believe in God and the religous values to do good to others. These are the woman who should be held in high esteem. These are the silent women, who recocognise that men and women need to live side-by-side in Harmony and Peace and without Disruption and Evil that is so synonymous of Toxic Women!
This comment is a copy of one left on the Counter-Feminist blog. These remarks are meant constructively:
“This version of Feminism was started by women who simply hated men. These women (mostly lesbians, incidentally) wanted men dis-empowered and some wanted Gendercide (the elimination of men). They saw the unique potential of Feminism as a means to bring ordinary women into their ranks and effectively hijacked it, wrapping it up in misandry and creating the Feminism we are burdened with today.
Most women today who call themselves Feminists are probably (and hopefully) ignorant of the far-reaching hatred embodied in the term. Women often believe it is to do with equality and fairness when in reality the ideology is now based on misandry.”
As long as that writer maintains that “bad”, “radical” feminism is some kind of perverted “version” of feminism – as opposed to the essence of feminism itself – he’s talking nonsense.
I don’t know why some men in the men’s movement do their best not to call a spade a spade.
This “radical feminist” nonsense – as if there is any other kind – that MRAs are talking must end.
Looking at things realistically, all feminism is anti-man, matriarchal and radically pro-female. Therefore, it cannot be accepted in any form. Feminism is the most cohesive political ideology on the planet, and has no significant splintering.
“Gendercide” is a meaningless term also, it’s a feminist term, I don’t know why the writer uses it. “Gender” is a feminist and women’s movement term. Using the enemy’s terminology to define yourself is a surefire path to failure.
Feminism wasn’t “hijacked” – this is yet another “moderate” MRA lie – it was ALWAYS evil, it was ALWAYS anti-male, it was ALWAYS matriarchal. It always WILL BE. These characteristics didn’t just “creep into” the 20th Century “version” of feminism – they were always the basis of feminism. The notion of feminism being “hijacked” is a lie so great that it warrants great rebuke.
Feminism was NEVER worthwhile or just, it was NEVER not a threat to men (as it always favoured the abolition of all male power).
As for his second paragraph this is naivity and stupidity. Who is he to tell women who proclaim themselves to be feminists, and who champion feminist causes, that they aren’t actually feminists, and that they don’t really believe in what they’re fighting for. His argument is becoming absurd. The sad truth that the writer refuses to acknowledge (denial complex) is that these “normal women” who are feminists know the anti-male hateful core of feminism, and they support it.
These “normal women” talk about “equality and fairness” the same way “radical feminists” talk about “equality and fairness”. I.e. the removal of all male power + matriarchy = “equality and fairness”. They have internalized – internally justified – this meaning so all is fine in their heads, and you won’t change them. The proper MRA way is not to argue with feminist women as a legitimate force at all. Certainly, we shouldn’t try to excuse their actions. Our only interaction with feminist women should be opposition. The time for extending olive branches and engaging in a “dialogue” is over – indeed it never began in the first place, feminist women would never allow it (and never will).
I would suggest that much of the toxic behaviors in the female that are mentioned and discussed are viewed as valid, acceptable and supported by our laws and society at large. This tells me that all females are toxic to someone. At the moment you may not be that someone, be patient. You’re next.
First, I would like to get an invitation code as I think this site is a great idea. As a high school teacher I see the day to day effects of “misandry” and broken homes where “breeding for cash” is the name of the game. I had grown up in such an invironment. Let me tell you about it: Shortly after my father passed, my mother revealed that my sister had been fathered by a man she had an adulterous affair with while still married to my father. Neither my grandfather, father, (half) sister nor myself had any knowledge of this classic paternity fraud until my mother dropped the bombshell. Although my mother made this disclosure there has never been any reconciliation, not even so much as an “I’m Sorry” for the lies and deceit or a “Thank you” for the stolen child support my late father provided. She remains unrepentant and unaccountable. And now problems are starting to arise out of this circumstance with regard to a family Trust which my “illegitimate” sister is trustee. As the only legitimate child in the family, I feel that I have suffered personal injury in the loss of assetts that my father had intended for HIS children but which in fact went to another man’s children (my half sister) and also the loss of “hijacked” inheritance that my half sister now holds full power of attorney over. It seems that the “toxic women” matriarchy that now controls the Western World has little regard for these thefts and at the present time my half sister treats me with nothing but scorn while she and her family are well compensated though her stipend for being trustee. They also stand to inherit a sizeable amount of money in due course which I feel was willed to her under fraud and deception as my grandfather had no idea of the criminality and financial perjury involved. My half sister will only communicate with me through her attorney paid for with trust money. And my mother won’t speak to me at all since I showed the timerity of criticising her reprehensible exploitation of men (including me) on my half sister’s behalf. And given the track record of nefarious deeds, of which I was a direct victem, there is certainly no guarantee that more and perhaps worse crimes might occur in the future. Obviously, I want to insure against any such outcome. Perhaps you or some of your readers might be able to provide some advice??? – Cheers, New Zealand
Hi William,
A man can never win in court, or anywhere else with women like these, look around you and you will see that women are allowed to kill men & children, with the full backing of the Government, Police & Court´s.
Be thankful that they have only taken you money and not your life or freedom.
You must leave these evil women behind and start enjoying life on your own, go to Rome, join a sport club, take up canoeing, etc..
How about making your request here:
http://www.mrausa.net/forumdisplay.php?f=9
Regards Edmond.
The circumstances you describe are common. There is no peaceful remedy. All social, legal and political options have been explored and failed during the past forty years. The kinds of people you are dealing with are malignant narcissists and psychopaths. Review on-line the definitions of these conditions, and they are a description of what has been institutionalized in our family courts, households, work-places, etc… The only solution to this kind of oppression by what is arguable the most tyrannical regime in the history of the world is war. If no one is willing to do what’s necessary to take back their freedom and civil and Constitutional rights, then they just won’t have them anymore. And neither will your children or grandchildren. Malignant narcissists and psychopaths don’t just give up their power and control because you want them to. It’s an addiction. They will manipulate anyone, lie cheat and steal to keep it. Each objection you express is interpreted by them as validation of their success in oppressing you. Unless you get rid of them, the problem and all its consequences aren’t going away. Currently a majority of fathers and other men have been enslaved by feminists and their male enablers. A majority of children have been trafficked by feminists and their male enablers. And for forty years, no one has done anything. You get what you deserve. Until you are willing to take up arms against your oppressors, you will always be oppressed. Malignant narcissists, among other things, have no empathy or analytical skills with which to appeal. They do not feel shame, guilt or remorse. They are solipsistic and have a tremendous sense of entitlement. They are lazy and violent and manipulative. They cannot be reasoned or negotiated with. They do not compromise. You and your children and everyone else are just tools or pawns to be used so that they may satisfy their addiction to power and control and sex. You are just props in their life to validate their existence because they have no internal locus with which they may validate it themselves. That’s all you are to them. That’s all your children are. Unless you get rid of them, it’s more of the same. Underlying all this is neurotransmitter balances. Basically, all women are crazy and you can’t do anything about it.
do you have transcripts of your videos? Id specially like to get copies of the Equality video transripts if you do.
I do have the scripts for the films, but I’m afraid these are complex beasts with a lot more info in them than just the spoken parts, so I’m afraid I can’t release them.
I’d like to hear from women who support this site. Women who are againt misandry are rare, but let’s face it, are needed to legitimize a site like this. Yes,I know, it’s defeatist to concede that men protesting against misandry is not popular, but I’m a realist. Women need to grow a spine and contribute to this site. You are out there!
I don’t think you’re defeatist at all. Very few people – men or women – care about misandry. Women don’t need to care unless it directly affects themselves in some way and men are not generally capable of caring about themselves in this way due to their psychology.
I’m also thinking along various lines to do with women and how they fit into the misandry debate. For me, it’s not about legitimacy, women’s direct support isn’t necessary. However, women’s opinions are very important and I’ll be exploring this in a new article soon about the Men’s Movement and Women.
Owing to the limitations of men (the male condition) they have a problem in effectively utilising the women who support the cause against misandry.
Getting female support is easy.
But, since most mra’s have aleady deballed themselves before they even approach women they don’t often get the most useful women supporting them..
The fight against misandry is not the same, by any means, as the fight against feminism..
I don’t even regard myself as a fighter against feminism, in fact, I don’t see “feminism” as something worth fighting.. Because its nothing more than a tool for the folks we really need to fight..
Dont aim for the sword, aim for the entity that wields the sword.. And simply dodge the sword, or use it against the person who wields it..
I shall leave some food for thought..
1. Men are more dangerously misandric than women, in practice..
2. Feminism in practice hurts women more than it hurts men.
Failure to realise these two points is a significant reason as to why the mens movement consistently fails to get power to men back from the state..
The usefulness of women to progress the mens movement is a vast untapped resource that the MRM seems to consistently fail to properly utilise..
The state, however, has managed to utilise women very well.. Thanks to the male condition..
Very interesting perspective and I agree very much with the vast potential of women as a resource. I’m not sure I agree with misandry and Feminism being a different fight (we would need to discuss) but I do agree that Feminism is a tool of the state and we should not be distracted from the real problem.
I am working on something to do with all this now and I’ll be in touch to go over some of your opinions.
One thing that came to mind when I was wondering why the fathers movement was failing to gain support despite getting occasional media attention was..
The movement is not focused enough on appealing to the public when it gets a media opportunity, it tends to focus too much on the “issues” and the “stunts” etc..
What we need to do, is, pretty directly, ask the public for help and support when we get the chance!
I have another term that may fit into the Glossary: “bear baiting”.
A big, strong bear, bound by chains and blinded, pitted against a (relatively weaker) human and possibly some dogs for the sick amusement of the crowd. The bear would naturally tear the human to shreds with ease, but it is severely handicapped in these inhumane matches.
Now compare that to a woman attacking a man. The man is likely to be bigger and stronger, it is simply a fact of nature, and he would easily defeat the smaller woman, but he is handicapped by a moral obligation to “never hit a woman” and mentally conditioned to accept the abuse rather than fight it. If the man dares to fight back he is vilified, and seen an inhuman beast that must be put down.
Some people find this amusing and celebrate (and encourage) small women who pick fights with and humiliate bigger men, who will generally refuse to fight someone weaker than them (especially a woman) until they are pushed utterly over the edge. I think the term “bear baiting” is quite appropriate for this practice.
I see complete segregation of the sexes as the only solution. Males and females will have to learn new skills in order to thrive and acheive balance.
Human population will decrease, resulting in greater sustainability in general.
you should read this
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/07/11/110711fa_fact_auletta?currentPage=1
How if men dominate the technology area and are the one that create our modern society, example, IBM,Google,FaceBook,Apple,Microsoft,Twitter etc they want to be include without give nothing to the area?
Read this
http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2011/07/07/2011-07-07_harlem_heroes_race_to_lift_car_after_boy_is_hit.html
How many men where there? haw is the strength of this woman? this woman did not do anything but she is the one on the picture.
Increase your word power: mammagement gynosaur kuntry vagitarian
Thanks for a fantastic website!
Great glossary of terms here, I was looking for the “Cuntservative Party”.. Headed by the “Prime Mangina” himself who famously had a pop at fathers on fathers day.. Leading directly to a few good men in the fathers movement scaling the his constituency office some months ago.. I was actually filmed and interviewed by the mainstream media (I was on “ground duty” in my spiderman suit).. when this was going on, but sadly the news was not broadcast, owing the the “news of the world” headlining at the same time and dominating the media that day..
Hi all, Ok, so I’m female, married 22yrs. Completely support your movement. Men are treated horribly by women. I am trying to raise MEN with character, pride, honor and reason-like my husband. He is much more reasonable than I am and thank god for it. We each have our strengths and we each spelled out our expectations before we were married. We have teens and observing younger men today, 20′s, early 30′s what is going on with them? I constantly encounter men who need so much hand holding and completely narcissistic (women too). Their mothers did not empower these children with the ability to reason, compromise or appreciate. My male friends in their late 30′s and over are angry and I can’t blame them. They have been used and abused and I’m embarrassed to say I know some of the women who did everything they could to hurt them. I am sickened by these women.
I once danced w/ a longtime friend who brought a pretty woman to an event. I questioned in his ear “Your date isn’t going to be happy seeing your hand that close to my ass”. To my ear his whispered, “I hired her to look good, act loving and sleep w/ me so don’t worry or judge.” “Judge? Jesus, you’re the smartest single man I know.”
Taking into account all the BS dating sites, I really liked his approach. Site looks good. All the best.
I found some of this stuff quite interesting, and I agree with the fact that feminism and courses such as “Women’s studies” are counterproductive to equality among the genders, and belittling to both men and women… but I must say, this site does put a load on women that I think deserves more clear specification : feminists. It will help reasonable equal-minded women like me stay on your side, instead of creating a larger divide among the sexes. We’re meant to be united, but there’s a lot of talk about “the war on men” that I think should be changed to “the war on the feminist movement,” because there are actually a lot men and women sick of the man-bashing self-righteous bitches out there, and are just as sick of misogynists as well! We need to stay on the same side.
Hi
I belong to a Muslim family and I would like to know why women think they are prettier and more sexually attractive then men and they use this weapon of theirs to obtain favors whether its in the workplace, media or somewhere else?
There was a case twenty years ago about a woman who killed her husband. They had been married for 12 years. He was a drunk and was beating her. One night he came home drunk, beat her up and passed out on the sofa. Then she took a knife and stabbed him 22 times until he was dead. In the murder trial she got found NOT GUILTY because she was suffering from ‘Battered Wife syndrom.’
I have a couple of questions about this. No doubt the man was bad and was beating her, so why did she marry him in the first place?
Why did she stay with him for 12 when he was beating her for many years before?
And that last time he beat her, why didn’t she just pack her bags and leave before he woke up instead of killing him? She even had the option of calling the cops and having him thrown out but she killed him instead. This happened in Newfoundland, Canada in 1993.