An outline of some of the terms and acronyms used within this site.
- Radical Feminism
- The FEMPLEX
- The Duluth Model
- Toxic Women
- The Male Condition
- False Rape Culture
- White Knight
- Tough Women
- Technical Women
- Worthless Women
- Irresponsible Mother
- Zeta Male
- Forced Fatherhood
- Paternity Fraud
- Vagina Syndrome – VS
- Feckless Female
- Feral Female
- Sick Older Women – SOWs
- Paedomums (Pedomoms)
- Super Bowl Hoax
- For the Muslims – FTM
- Pay Per View
- Jail bait
- Potential False Accuser – PFA
- Harridan Harman
- The Labia Party
- Child Protection
- Primitives in Pantsuits (PIPs)
- Prime Mangina
- Earnest Feminist
- Radical Feminist
- Shaming Language
- The Pussy Pass
- Glass Ceiling
- Glass Cellar
- Pay Gap
- Male Chauvinism
- Red Pill
- Blue Pill
- Comments (26)
Defined as “the hatred of men”.
In Western society, misandry is part of the fabric of daily life and can be seen virtually everywhere – in politics, health, education and media.
The deaths of men are disguised by their job titles; the health of men is under-resourced in favour of resourcing women’s health; the vastly larger suicide and homeless rates for men are not addressed by government; men are deemed automatically bad and women automatically good in the Marxist sense; men are deemed as inherently dangerous particularity around children and women; men’s suffering and pain is belittled, laughed-at and dismissed; men are increasingly becoming second-class citizens; men have unequal protection under the law and their suffering is allowed and actually encouraged; men are forcefully separated from their children; men are being forced out of the education system; the list goes on and on and is growing and deepening at a frightening pace.
However the size, scale and commonality of misandry is such, that it has become hidden in plain view.
Men are bad, bad, bad
The medical science of male health, concerning diseases and functions unique to men. Counterpart to gynaecology.
Feminism is the project for increasing the power of women. With no end point. Indefinitely. Forever.
Feminism is the modern packaging of Gynocentrism, an ancient product, made possible in its present form by the extensive public welfare arrangements of the post-war period.
(credit: Gynocentrism Theory)
An ideology that is essentially about forcefully encouraging women into the workplace with the false dichotomy that if women are not working, then they are oppressed by men. Additionally, Feminism at it’s root, is based on the false premise that: “men have things good at the expense of women, who have things bad”. All supposed types of Feminism have this fallacy as their foundation and it follows that all forms of Feminism are therefore flawed in the same way.
The methods used to do this are numerous but are generally focused on convincing women of their superiority to men and insisting that women have always lived under the shadow of patriarchy. During the 1960′s, Feminism became forcefully joined with Radical Feminism (see below) to become the version of Feminism that persists today.
This version of Feminism was started by women who simply hated men. These women (mostly lesbians, incidentally) wanted men dis-empowered and some wanted Gendercide (the elimination of men). They saw the unique potential of Feminism as a means to bring ordinary women into their ranks and effectively enveloped it, wrapping it up in misandry and creating the Feminism we are burdened with today.
Many women today who call themselves Feminists are semi-ignorant of the far-reaching hatred embodied in the term, but a great many are not ignorant and support it regardless. Women will often blindly assert that it is to do with ‘equality’ and ‘fairness’ when in reality, the ideology is based solely on misandry.
The idea that women are superior to men and deserve to be the ruling class.
Female-supremacism is the hidden part of Feminism and is best described as Feminism’s core belief.
The integrated complex of sociopolitical operation supporting the twin interests of female-supremacism and women’s advocacy. This term was coined to better encompass the breadth of Feminism where simply using the term ‘Feminism’ is a) not comprehensive enough; b) too vague.
This term is partly founded on the idea that Feminism is a subset of female-supremacism and represents the acceptable face of the hate movement.
Derived from : “The Feminisitical Operations Complex” (FEMinisitical Operations ComPLEX). Akin to the ‘military industrial complex‘.
Men’s Rights Activist (also Men’s Rights Advocate, Male Renaissance Agitator). Any man (or woman, I suppose) who is aware of misandry in our society and takes steps to remedy it.
Also MM – Men’s Movement.
Men’s Rights Movement. Principally, the body of men and opinion furthering the cause of men’s basic human rights.
The commonly held idea that men rule the world with all institutions run by men and for the good of men. Covered and debunked in Film 30 – Equality: Patriarchy.
The more probable model for western societies where females are regarded as the more worthy sex and are in complete control of reproduction and consume the most resources. Most things are run by men for the good of women.
The Duluth Model
The idea is that society is male dominated and men use their power in various ways including being violent to women. The model asserts that all men are like this due to the relative positions of men and women in society. Essentially, men are born into a world where they automatically become oppressors of women and women are born into oppression by men. Yes, it’s as black and white as that and as wilfully ignorant as that and yet it heavily informs policy on domestic violence to this day.
The Duluth “wheel” model is applied in virtually all training regarding domestic violence, police practice and therapy methods, and is utilised in the creation of government policy on domestic violence and so it negatively affects every man’s status in law.
The idea that concepts within biology can be applied to explain the behaviour of agencies such as government, large charites and businesses. Organisations have an existence and a powerful need to survive and grow over and above any existence they have to serve people. Once an organisation – an organism – exists, it fights to survive and competes for resources with other organisations in a very similar way to the way living creatures behave.
For example, the US Presidency. If the sitting President were to disappear tomorrow, the Presidency itself would remain in full effect, unchanged except with a different individual at the helm.
Once an organisation exists, it begins to serve itself before all other things, and it is important that we appreciate this. The head of a political party must serve their party before their country or they will never rise to be head of the party. The same thing applies to almost all other organisations.
By utilising our knowledge of what motivates animals and human beings, we can better model the motivations and actions of large organisations and better understand their true agendas.
(Credit: Angry Harry)
A woman is Toxic if she has embraced Feminism and lives according to it’s tenets of complete selfishness and irresponsibility for women. The Toxic woman is very common and shows no signs of dying out. Indeed, Toxic women significantly outnumber non-Toxic women.
The Toxic woman thinks it is fine to strip a man of assets on divorce, fine to deny him access to his own children because it’s what she wants, it’s ok to sue her own employer or colleagues because she feels oppressed in some way, it’s the right thing to do to accuse a man of rape if he doesn’t cuddle her in the morning, it is justified for her to take jobs in the fire service, the police or the military and receive the same pay as men without having anything like the same ability or taking anything like the same risk.
It is not safe for a man to be alone with the Toxic woman and nor is it safe for him to drive her home or pay her a compliment – false accusations are ready to be flung by the toxic woman who tends to have one of a range of personality disorders.
The Toxic woman should not be dated, stood next to, employed or interacted with in any way by a man wishing to avoid enormous problems in his life. (Article here)
The Male Condition
My description for a patchwork of liabilities in the thoughts and actions of many men that enables misandry to flourish. It contains, but is not limited to:
- Accepts that criminal behaviour from a minority of men is representative of men in general e.g. ‘Men can stop rape’
- Walks a ‘mile in her shoes’ even though she wouldn’t walk a single step in his (not that it would occur to him to ask her)
- Capitulates to any and every Feminist demand believing that it represents what women want
- Has no conception that the ‘other men‘ and ‘bad men’ women malign, also includes himself
- Has no concept of solidarity with other men
- Does not see himself as part of the group ‘men’, but rather sees himself by his occupation or as a ‘gamer’ etc
- To acknowledge misandry is an admission of weakness
- Minimises and rationalises his own pain and any other man’s suffering as unimportant
- Makes excuses for misandry and those who promote it
- Women first
- Women are the fairer sex
- Women are better than men
- Competition for female attention
- Girls are made of “sugar and spice”
- Under-developed sense of self and his own psychology
- Low self-esteem, low self-respect and low sense of self-worth
- Sees his own needs as secondary to everyone else’s, particularly women
- Sees himself as an unpaid bodyguard to any and all women (Hero, from the Greek serow = protector-slave)
False Rape Culture
A counterpoint to the the unsupportable idea that women live in a “Rape Culture”. False Rape Culture is of far greater validity in the simple fact that while we readily destroy a man’s life on the say so of a false accuser, we do not punish the false accuser adequately and in fact, rarely punish her at all. Further, whereas the crime of rape is regarded to be of essentially equal seriousness to murder in our society, false rape accusations are indefensibly regarded as far less serious.
The complete destruction of reputation, career, family and even the life of men is regarded as being of little importance and therefore, times are good for the false accuser (credit: Paul Elam, A Voice for Men)
False allegations, prevalence and consequences
(clip from Rape)
A man spoon-fed on chivalry and who firmly (and naively) believes in the moral superiority of women over men and so holds women on a pedestal.
As Feminism has made most women toxic and woefully undeserving of chivalry, the White Knight is a sad, although common anachronism. In metaphorically rescuing damsels in distress and in putting women first, he receives nothing but contempt in return.
A White Knight:
- Believes that women are superior to men and simultaneously believes that women need protection like children
- Will rescue a woman first over a man simply because she’s female
- Believes in “women first” in everything
- Will risk his life for a stranger if she’s a woman, but would not do the same for a man
- Will spring to the defence of any woman even if she is in the wrong
- Will fight other men to defend a woman’s honour, even if she has none
- Believes that his own life is worth less than the life of any female, anywhere
- Et al
This identifies the unfeasibly tough female characters that Hollywood in particular seems hell-bent on inserting into films, typically action films.
They are not only tough, they are super-tough and typically tougher than most men in the film. They are virtually always shown to outdo, outperform or out-tough a man at some point in the action. See Misogyny 1
The equivalent of Tough Women but in technical areas. These women are presented by Hollywood as technical geniuses who leave men floundering in their wake particularly in the field of computing. See Misogyny 1
This is the implausible situation presented in film where the love interest of the male hero is not a woman that any sensible man would generally regard as a good or worthwhile woman to pursue.
In other words, a woman of low appeal to a man when it comes to a serious relationship (prostitute, unfaithful, deeply selfish, uncaring, drug addicted, violent, spiteful etc), and women with little to no redeeming qualities are miraculously portrayed as the apple of our hero’s eye. It counts as Hollywood’s valiant attempt to make the typical modern Feminist worthless woman, worthy of a man’s best efforts to woo, when the truth is that Western women have become largely toxic.
Description covering various misbehaviours by women who choose to become mothers in poor circumstances, without a willing father or else behave criminally (or in ways that should be classed as criminal) while pregnant or as mothers.
For example, smoking, drinking alcohol and drug-taking whilst pregnant; failing to breastfeed for no other reason than lifestyle choice; choosing to conceive in full knowledge that the father does not want or is not ready for children; choosing to be single mothers. See Irresponsible Mothers
How irresponsible is she?
(clip from Irresponsible Mothers)
Counter point to the Alpha Male and Beta Male paradigms (which have a degree of validity but are closely tied to women’s opinions, needs and wants). The Zeta Male defines his masculinity according to his own rules, quite separate from his relation to women.
MGTOW (Men Going their own way) are generally examples of Zeta Males, but more and more men who might not identify with that philosophy are displaying Zeta Male tendencies due to the toxicity of Feminist women. It is self-defence for men in a period in history when manhood itself is under assault from a number of directions.
(credit: Paul Elam, A Voice for Men)
Where a man does not choose when and with whom he has children, sadly, the current situation for the majority of men in the post-contraceptive pill world.
I would hazard that most men in the western world do not choose when they become fathers, the decision is made for them by women. This is a leading cause of fatherlessness as the man is effectively enslaved and will often seek to resist that enslavement.
A known and generally understood term but one massively underused when considering the high prevalence of this crime (average 10% of children but ranging from 1% in high income areas to as much as 30% in poor areas – See Paternity Fraud). Usage is often softened with euphemism e.g. misattributed fatherhood as if the woman made a simple minor error that time she duped a man into devoting his life into raising a child he thinks is his, but is not.
Paternity Fraud is an evil and ongoing crime against men
(Clip from Paternity Fraud)
The fact is, a woman who does this invalidates a man’s life and biological future, potentially stripping him of his life’s ambition. Such a woman is an evil, toxic criminal and there are no excuses for such utterly reprehensible behaviour. Paternity Fraud should be a crime punishable with significant prison time. But of course, because the perpetrators are female, paternity fraud is not actually considered a crime at all.
An argument against paternity fraud being “that big a deal” is that when a man finds out it’s been committed against him, it shouldn’t really matter because he’s still a father to the child, just not biologically linked. Really? Fine, then when women give birth in hospital, let the nurses swap all the babies around so that the mother has no idea if the baby she takes home is hers or not. It doesn’t matter if it’s her baby because she’ll still be a mother to the child, right?
Vagina Syndrome – VS
Similar to the pussy pass but is a collective name describing how women have a syndrome to explain their every criminal act and most other misbehaviour.
A syndrome for every crime
(clip from Child Abuse)
Where a woman is fully aware that a man has had several children with several other women but decides to have a child with him anyway. The woman and society at large, then blames the man for being irresponsible. You couldn’t make this stuff up. Counterpoint to Feckless Fathers. See Irresponsible Mothers
A woman so sullied with the toxicity of Feminist thought, so toxic and so thoroughly removed from common decency towards men, that she has become essentially, bestial. Harridan Harman is a good example of this sort of woman.
Sick Older Women – SOWs
AKA known as cougars. Older women who prey on (ideally for them) teenage boys as their sexual fantasy and yet are applauded for it in our culture. If men the same age were to display such lust for teenage girls the police would be arresting them for sexual predation. Gotta love equality.
Description for mothers who sexually abuse their children, a highly prevalent crime particularly in single mother households. See Child Abuse.
Introducing the Female Paedophile
(clip from Child Abuse)
Also Shequality and Mequality where appropriate.
The permanent state of bias in favour of women in all aspects of our culture as desired by Feminists. The wish for an ongoing state of female entitlement and encouragement at the expense of men and boys that its supporters hope will lead naturally to female supremacy. We are well on the way. (credit: JockeVXO)
Not All Women Are Like That. That near-mythical female creature who is different to the toxic women out there that are the demonstrable cause of many severe problems for men. The problem, is that all women, even the toxic ones, claim to be this rare, halo-wearing creature.
The typical refrain from those (usually women) that use this term, is that all a man has to do to have a happy life and avoid toxic Feminist women, is “choose the right woman”. It doesn’t matter that the game is rigged against men and indeed is the equivalent of a minefield for men, no, men just need to be careful and wise and he will be fine. That’s like having a law that says: “Any man that steps foot outside his house after midnight may be shot by the police” and recommending to men that the best way to deal with this situation, is not to try and change such an unfair and dangerous law, but instead, to “carefully choose” what time he goes out.
As I commented on this video:
“The vast majority of women are complicit in their support for Feminism and misandry, despite their awareness of the damage to men and boys.
It’s laughable when people suggest that the system is fine and men need only pick the “right” women in order to avoid the very serious problems a man can easily encounter in our Feminist society. I’m sure these women (and men) would also suggest that men would have fair odds playing Russian Roulette, using a six-shooter loaded with 4 bullets.”
Not All Feminists Are Like That (also NLTOF – Not Like Those Other Feminists). The Feminists who are entirely as hateful in their views as any other Feminist, yet, due to minor ideological distinctions, claim to be somehow different in that they are good, kind, fair, genuine, real, true, first-wave, orphan-loving or halo-wearing Feminists.
Feminist media sources, the kind which will only report on matters concerning women. This means virtually all mainstream news sources airing today and most non-mainstream sources as well.
A great number of these news reports make deliberate use of factoids; biased, inflated and even invented statistics; deliberate misinformation;and blatant misandry concerning the plight of women. The Femedia amounts to a plague and it is very difficult to encounter genuine journalism on any topic to do with men and women. The UK BBC is perhaps the greatest exponent of this kind of (mis)reporting.
See Christina Hoff Sommers on Violence Against Women (including analysis of the Domestic Violence industry and the Super Bowl Hoax):
“We’re not talking about a few errors. We’re not talking about occasional lapses. We’re talking about a body of egregiously false information at the heart of the domestic violence movement. False claims are pervasive; false claims are not the exception, they’re the rule.”
- Christina Hoff Sommers, Continuing Distortions about Intimate Partner Abuse
Super Bowl Hoax
Also World Cup Hoax and [insert major sporting event here] Hoax.
The Super Bowl Hoax, which first occurred in 1993, falsely claimed that more women are victims of domestic violence on Super Bowl Sunday than any other day of the year. The public outcry arising from the hoax spurred passage of the Violence Against Women Act the following year. A complete account of the Super Bowl Hoax can be seen here: http://www.snopes.com/crime/statistics/superbowl.asp.
See also, Christina Hoff Sommers on Violence Against Women and false statistics.
Feminist counterpart to history and a worrying trend where misinformation is deliberately supplanting the genuine historical record. Whereas history is the factual record of what happened, herstory is the record of how women prefer to see it.
The most classic example of this historical revisionism is the false idea of women’s voting rights oppression i.e. women’s suffrage.
When most men and women couldn’t vote
(yet, strangely, we only hear about the women…)
(clip from Suffrage)
An offshoot of the utterly pointless “Women’s Studies” programme, the achievements and sacrifices of the men around them are minimised in this female narrative and history is magically retold into herstory with a wishful reinterpretation of events and a multitude of historical revisions to make women feel better about their contributions in times past.
The mythical accomplishments of Ada Lovelace is one example, the equally mythical bravery of women on British warships in the 18th Century is another:
Feminists rewrite history
(clip from Winners of Feminism)sy
And it’s not just me saying it! Here is a quote from a Youtube user on one of the documentary films:
“I’m in history at my uni and it is unbelievable how history is being rewritten to make women feel good about their role. Not only is all western history broad-brushstroked as oppressive etc, but literally in my American history class the role of women knitting quilts was being analyzed in the American civil war, instead of men dying.”
Furthermore, we shouldn’t forget that, according to herstoy, the hateful white feather campaign against men didn’t really happen. Women were far too busy being oppressed to be so thoroughly despicable. Surely?
Thoroughly wicked women in history (strangely absent from herstory)
(clip from War)
Further likely effects of herstory:
Please take note of the three predictions that follow, and please remember that you read them here first:
In due course, the text books that we supply to our children in schools, will describe the D-Day landings as: “The men and women who landed on the beaches of Normandy”.
In due course, when the ultimate sacrifice of our soldiers (an overwhelmingly male sacrifice) is being reported, look for some journalist to one day be the first to describe “the brave servicewomen and men who gave their lives”.
In due course, look for the world to remember the revised immortal words of Neil Armstrong as he set foot on the moon: “One small step for a human, one giant leap for humankind”.
Then again, it may be that these predictions have already come true; when it comes to misandry, very little surprises me in our Feminised times.
See also Female-Centrism
For the Muslims – FTM
Feminist women who readily acknowledge that they are treated better than men in the West and that men are officially becoming second-class citizens, yet still choose to be Feminists because they believe that Muslim women are oppressed somewhere in the Middle East.
These same Feminist women could not distinguish Saudi Arabia from Yemen on a map and have never stepped foot in the Middle-East, yet they proclaim deep and certain knowledge of the supposedly awful female experience under Muslim Sharia law. See also Female -Centrism.
Any gathering of Feminist women where the topic under discussion is how oppressed they are in society. Typical meeting places are Starbucks coffee houses, generally in the middle of the day while their (oppressive) men folk are busy at work.
A male Feminist and honorary female. A man who is more female in his world view than most women and on principle, supports female viewpoints on virtually any topic, even when those views detract from his own civil or human rights as a man. See also He-woman
As Barry White might croon, the world where women are first, last and everything particularly in news reporting or in analysis of history. A female-centric viewpoint looks at any situation, generally a negative one, only as it affects women, ignoring the fact that those same negative effects may be occurring against men and especially ignoring situations where men experience greater problems than women.
A female –centric news report for example, would be one where the headline reads “50 women raped in war zone” whilst barely mentioning “100 men killed” in the same area at the same time. In history it’s something like “women were denied the vote” whilst failing to acknowledge that most men were also denied the vote during the same period, and further ignoring that at that same time, men who did not have the vote were being conscripted for war whilst women were exempt.
Pay Per View
Child support payments that are in reality, ‘mother-lifestyle-enhancement’ payments that are required to be paid by fathers to allow them access to their non-resident children.
Pay-per-view is the onus placed on non-resident fathers to pay court-mandated child support, far in excess of what a child actually needs and what care of a child actually costs in order to be allowed to see the child for some minimal time of the mother’s choosing. Visitation rights for the father are on a pay-per-view basis.
Paying for time
(clip from Irresponsible Mothers)
A man who is so wrapped up in a female-centric world-view that he can no longer see the world as it is and can only see it as it relates to women. Such a man could look upon a man and a woman who have both fallen overboard from a ship and run for help shouting “Woman overboard! Woman overboard!” See also Mangina
Any adult woman under the age of 25 with whom a man might have sex. Yes, that’s the way we’re headed.
Potential False Accuser – PFA
Any toxic woman you date. Or have sex with. Or don’t have sex with. Or don’t call the next day after having sex. Or work with. Or share an elevator with. Or smile at. Or don’t smile at. Et al.
The likelihood of punishment for false accusations is low and what consequences there are, tend to be very mild. Therefore, there is very little to inhibit a toxic female from making false allegations if she feels slighted or is otherwise annoyed with a man, or wishes to gain some advantage such as with accusations against celebrities or to harm a man in divorce and custody cases.
also Harriet Harm-men (credit: BobbyL)
A more suitable moniker for our dear Harriet Harman MP, possible the most hateful and influential female supremacist in the UK and Europe and perhaps even beyond. An impressive woman, if that is, you’re impressed by deeply sick individuals.
See Feral Female
The Labia Party
Aka Labour Party, So named here for their near single minded socialist, big government and overwhelmingly Feminist agenda, the huge cost of which which is the principal reason Britain has been so exposed to the financial crisis.
A children’s helpline run by the NSPCC in the UK. The phone line purports to exist to help children suffering from some sort of abuse from someone (particularly their parents), or any other problem they might face.
In reality, the service exists primarily as a further attack on the structure and purpose of family and counts as an insidious attempt to subvert the relationships between family members. They want children’s first port of call to be them and the state rather than anyone in the family that the child knows. In this way, more funding is generated for the NSPCC business.
A Feminist shakedown outfit posing as an organisation for the “prevention of cruelty to children”.
In reality, this organisation is responsible for perhaps more damage to children and the relationships within families than any other entity now or in history. They deliberately and unfairly target men as abusers of children in an effort to further separate men from children’s lives and thereby, ironically, create a need for the very services they provide.
In other words, they generate lucrative business for themselves by breaking apart families using the principal method of painting all men as potential and indeed likely paedophiles. Due to the enormous amounts of income they generate from the use of children and children’s issues, they count as quite possibly the most toxic anti-family organisation in Britain today.
They seek evermore legislation under the mantra of furthering child protection which is coded language for their deliberate attempts to use children to generate income from the public and the state. They represent little in the way of good purpose and can be regarded as an almost entirely toxic and parasitic business that needs to be exposed for the base, money-making enterprise that it is.
The NSPCC’s hate campaign against men
(clip from Child Abuse)
The warm and fuzzy language used to describe a set of principles and rules mandated to be used by all people and organisations that work with children. The idea is that it is everyone’s responsibility to watch out for children’s welfare to the extent that if you should have any concerns whatsoever about a child you come into contact with, you should report it to your designated child-protection officer.
Such rules and regulations successfully foster an environment of mistrust, finger-pointing and suspicion where it is seen as justified for state workers, the police and NGO’s like the NSPCC to stake dominion over the welfare of children and reduce the role and protection of the family. In this way, we grant ever more power over children to the state and reduce the responsibilities and rights of parents with the justification that it’s for child protection. Who could argue with that?
A concept that describes how women are the equivalent of a ball in a ball-game i.e. women are like a basketball or football or tennis ball etc. In order to win a game of basketball, for example, the winning team has to get control of the ball, keep possession and score with it. That’s what agencies like the government, media and charities have become adept at doing: getting control of women; forming women’s opinions; satisfying women’s desires. They then proceed to slam dunk over men’s civil rights.
Feminism is simply a means of getting hold of women. Once you have control of women (just like control of the basketball), you control the game. Feminism counts as possibly the all-time greatest play. In my opinion, if men are to succeed in any way in winning back their basic human rights, they have to learn the rules of the game and get control of the ball. They need to learn WomenBall.
More on this in an upcoming article.
The typically tragic and hugely negative result after an area of life has been sullied with Feminism. The Education system, for example, has been Feministed. As has the fire service, the police service and the military.
When Feminists choose to target an aspect of life or some activity, when they lay they hands on it and warp it to suit the demands of their insidious doctrine, it has been well and truly Feministed. To the detriment of us all.
Refers to Hollywood’s unwritten rule which commands that men must – if at all possible – be portrayed as the evil-doers in the personal history of any given character.
- If a character was sexually abused as a child, it was the father that did it.
- If a character was abandoned by a parent, it was the father that left.
- If they were homeless, the father kicked them out.
- If they were beaten by one of their parents, you can bet that it was the father (oh, and did I mention that he beat the mother too? And kicked the family dog? And drowned the goldfish?).
- If the mother is an alcoholic, she was driven to it by her philandering, irresponsible husband/father. Who also beat her. And the kids.
- If a woman is a single mother it’s never her fault , it’s because her husband/boyfriend beat her and she was forced to leave him.
You get the idea. Next time you come across an incidental back-story in a film (or book or TV series), generally evil, generally abusive, you can be virtually assured that the abuser will be male. It’s just easier that way.
Primitives in Pantsuits (PIPs)
(credit: Gynocentrism Theory)
An apt term for Britain’s Prime Minister and misandrist-in-chief.
It doesn’t matter who holds the post, they tend to be either philosophically weak in that they bow to Feminist pressure, or else they are even weaker, in that they enthusiastically promote the Feminist agenda.
The feminised education system currently in force in western society, that will run our economies into the ground under the weight of feeble-minded (and mostly female) hordes holding degrees in ‘Womens Studies’.
The education environment that is actively hostile to boy students and male teachers and also to the subjects that boys like such as science, mathematics and engineering. It counts as a deliberate, long-term effort to drive all men out of education. Permanently.
Education in video.
The paradigm of male sacrifice for the benefit of women. This is the historical norm, and it was the way of the world long before anything called ‘Feminism’ made itself known.
That men should sacrifice themselves utterly – their very essence, their being and their identity, to save women that they do not even know – is neatly encapsulated in that popular phrase, ‘women and children first.’
(And if you’re paying special attention, you will notice that it is never uttered as ‘children and women first.’ The very thought is absurd! This is because what is really meant by the phrase is ‘women first, children second.’)
(credit: Gynocentrism Theory)
An adopter of Feminism and therefore a Misandrist, bigot, PIP, female-centrist, gynocentrist and all-round selfish human being who sees the world not in a logical fashion, but in terms of emotions and arbitrary morals.
There are no good Fascists, no good racists and no good Feminists (despite what Feminists will often wail)
A misandrist without the courage of her convictions, a misandrist by inaction, or else a misandrist by virtue of unforgivable ignorance. The earnest Feminist is often well-meaning and serves as a ‘useful idiot‘ to the principal aims of Feminism.
Earnest feminists do not necessarily intend any of the outcomes relished by Radical Feminists, but as they are members of the collective, they will act as members of the collective, and even if they do not participate in the active persecution of men, they will be forbidden – as an unspoken rule – from exhibiting any sympathy at all for men, no matter what they suffer. Those who do are promptly expelled, labelled anti-feminists, and subject to vicious attacks by the in-group. No feminist will stop the process of male elimination, nor will she feel any regret once it is complete, as long as she remains a feminist.
(credit: Gynocentrism Theory)
A pure, unadulterated, self-confessed misandrist.
Holocaust is the ultimate utopian vision of some radical feminists, and they are perfectly open about this, discussing the male-free world of the future as insipidly as if they were discussing holiday plans. Other radical feminists imagine a future in which men’s numbers are greatly reduced and the remaining males are kept as slaves. Still others dream of a society similar to ours, but with women in the lead in all spheres of life, with all pretense to equality abandoned.
(credit: Gynocentrism Theory)
Virtually the only form of argument used by Feminists against valid criticism of their creed. It’s an attempt to control debate about Feminism and avoid substantive discussion by labeling, smearing and falsely characterising the critic.
It involves a deliberate failure to address the issue at hand in any particular argument and instead, amounts to purely ad hominem attacks on the critic in an attempt to ‘shut him up’. Shaming language is used by the Feminist in a pretence of addressing the ‘motives’ of the critic, when the reality is that it’s a desperate ploy to distract from the vacuity of the Feminist position. The various insults and diversions are typically of the form:
- You hate women
- You’re a misogynist
- You have a small penis
- You can’t get laid
- You’re bitter
- Stop whining
- Man Up!
- You have deep-seated resentment of women
- You’re afraid of women
- When did you start hating women?
- et al
The Pussy Pass
The overwhelming tendency within the legal system, the media and government to believe that women are examples of purest innocence in the world and any crime that they commit should not be punished with equal severity to men who commit the same crime. Put more simply, the Pussy Pass is the tendency to grant criminal women leniency in sentencing due to their possession of a vagina and perhaps a nice smile.
It is due to the Pussy Pass that:
- domestic violence committed by women is deemed less serious than that committed by men
- women who kill are somehow forced into it by circumstances or else are suffering from a convenient female-only syndrome, whereas men kill because they’re evil
- women who rape children are not treated as rapists but instead are deemed to have had “affairs” with “young men” who appeared “older than their years” and who “enjoyed the experience”
- women who steal are doing so in desperation or for their families, men who steal are despicable, low-life thieves
- men who commit crimes should be locked up and the keys thrown away, in contrast, women’s prisons shouldn’t even exist
- The list goes on
The largely imaginary invisible barrier faced by women preventing them from ascending into the most senior positions in companies. This barrier is supposedly built, maintained and jealously guarded by chauvinistic males who want to keep women down.
The reality is that whilst glass ceilings of sorts may exist, wherever they are, they are in place for a multitude of reasons and many people might be affected by them for many different reasons. In the case of women, glass ceilings may exist because:
- They took extensive leave to bear and raise children, compared with men who didn’t
- They can’t work out of town for extended periods due to parental responsibilities
- They choose not to work the hours necessary for promotion
- They decide that high power, high stress positions don’t appeal
- They fail to compete with men going for the same positions (e.g. do white sprinters face a glass ceiling, or do certain black sprinters simply run faster than them?)
- They choose to work part-time
- They choose lower paying, less stressful, more pleasant jobs, with fewer promotion prospects
- Et al
Also Glass Floor.
Also Wage Gap.
A popular term in the men’s movement (particulalry from A Voice for Men) which describes the choice to face and deal with tough and often nasty realities, rather than the easy illusions of life. If you take the Red Pill, you look at the world as it is and not as it is often protrayed by government, the media and by other organisations with various agenda’s. Red Pill men are quite rare and tend towards being Zeta Males. Red Pill women are much rarer, but they do exist
- A Red Pill person does not buy the fallacy that domestic violence is only caused and perpetrated by men
- A Red Pill person questions the factoids they are often presented with on TV (1 in 4 women are raped; 1 in 4 women are abused; 1 in 4 women are decapitated, etc)
- A Red Pill man understands how chivalry is a tool used to oppress him and chooses not to be a White Knight
- A Red Pill man understands that women are not made of sugar and spice and that men are not made of frogs and snails
- Et al
Men’s Human Rights Movement.