I’ve written before about the unwise and unfortunate inclusion of female referees (and also judges) officiating UFC bouts. What I didn’t cover was the consequences for the UFC over and above the problems for the relevance and standing of the sport.
A woman amongst men
00m 16s
(Clip from UFC 130)
As I will cover in the forthcoming film on Intimacy, there is an increasing scarcity of male-only spaces anywhere in society and a simultaneous expansion of female-only spaces. This is a major problem for men, though most fail to recognise it. Particularly men.
Indeed, men will often be the first to laud the inclusion of women in any activity as progressive and positive for women. When these same men encounter female-only domains, well, they laud the exclusion of men as progressive and positive for women…
Men-only = Bad
1m 02s
(Clip from Intimacy)
What do the elite fighters think and feel on being officiated by a female? What do the viewers think?
They”ll say zip but the reality is that on a visceral level, perfectly justified, they will be aware it is wrong. As wrong as a 12 year-old police officer or a 14 year-old high court judge. All things are possible but not all things are advisable. This is all perfectly clear if we allow ourselves to think and are not cowed by political correctness and Feminist doctrine. No easy task.
Consequences of Female referees in the UFC
(EDIT: Referees are appointed by State Athletic Commissions, not by the UFC. This is important to note but does not change the thrust of the article).
1) One of the tasks of the referee is to body check fighters before entering the ring. This means physically touching the fighters from head-to-toe feeling for anything out of place on the fighters body. The clip here shows the process as carried out by our intrepid female referee Kim.
Sexual Harassment in Action
0m 45s
(Note how she is ignored by the third fighter she feels up – Nate Diaz - as she attempts to exert her authoritah)
This process would be quite obviously classed as sexual harassment if the referee was male and the fighter female. This procedure simply could not be performed by a man on a woman. Why is it allowed here?
Additionally, this female physical contact just before fight time (undoubtedly with ultra-strong perfume wafting from her skin and filling his nostrils) is not conducive to a his mindset while preparing to do his work any more than it is at any other workplace.
I’ve lost count of the number of times women in places I’ve worked enter a room and then leave shortly afterwards, yet the smell of their perfume is still strong in the room an hour after they’ve left. This should not be acceptable in the workplace and this includes the UFC. We don’t yet have smell-o-vision TV so I don’t know her fragrance of choice, but I have no doubt that it’s there and everyone near her can smell it.
She stinks so good
00m 39s
(Clip from Sexual Harassment)
2) The next consequence concerns the typical one where a woman is put into position due to affirmative action: many more qualified men must have been passed over in order for the female to make it into the ring.
If you doubt this, ask yourself how many women you know who have hungered for the thrill of competitive hand-to-hand combat and decided to perhaps pursue a career as a ring referee. How many women do you think relish the idea of being that close to serious violence, sweaty and typically bloodied bodies and the risk of having to interpose between very dangerous fighters should one of them be in trouble? How many girls do you know that fit this bill?
Make no mistake, a long list of more qualified and experienced men have been bypassed so that Kim could play referee.
3) It is only a matter of time before a female ring referee makes a complaint to the organisation or state commission of sexual harassment or discrimination in one of it’s myriad (and often mythical) forms:
- She’ll complain that a fighter (or any other man she comes into contact with in the UFC organisation) has not shown her sufficient respect, or has slighted her in some way, or made an inappropriate comment, or looked at her askance, or looked like he might be thinking of saying something that she didn’t like. And disciplinary action, fines, suspensions and dismissals against the men will follow. This is already happening in UK football.
- She’ll complain that she’s not been allowed to officiate the top events. And so more qualified men will be bumped off the ticket to let her play at referee in the championship bouts.
- Then she’ll complain that although she’s officiating some top events, she’s not doing enough of them. And, under fear of litigation, more male referees will be bumped and we’ll have more make-up, hairspray and perfume in the Octagon.
- She’ll complain that there aren’t enough other female referees to keep her company in the locker room. And so more women who have never received a Muay Thai leg kick or performed a triangle will be brought in for the sake of equality. In fact, there will be a push for more females than males because that would be even more equal.
4) A female referee will be hurt as she tries to interpose herself between fighters to stop them. She’ll have been raised on a diet of Hollywood tough women and will believe that she, or indeed any female, can easily break up two UFC fighters exchanging blows.
Her lack of mass, inferior strength, slighter build and inexperience of being in harms way (i.e. involved in real fighting against men, not women’s idea of fighting, bless ‘em) will mean she would likely be hurt far more severely than a man. No doubt she would be generously compensated and the fighters punished if at all possible. A typical male referee would let it go, a typical female would seek out a lawyer.
5) A fighter will be hurt more severely than necessary when a female referee fails to interpose swiftly enough or surely enough with her feminine frame. Any female Big John McCarthys’ out there? Or Herb Deans’? I think not.
6) Last but not least, she’ll complain that the scantily clad UFC Octagon girls are demeaning to women and her standing as a referee. It creates a hostile working environment, she’ll squeal, and the Octagon girls will become a memory of happier, un-Feministed times.
Farewell, ladies. Your days in this line of work are numbered.
Remember you heard it here first: the introduction of female referees will inevitably lead to the abolition of the UFC Octagon girls.
As I have recounted here, here and here, women in the workplace are often woefully toxic. They simply cannot work within a job, they seem only capable of changing a job to suit them, everyone else be damned.
The bottom line
When these complaints from female officials happen – as they inevitably will – there are going to be consequences. And those consequences are going to affect the UFC negatively and victimise the men involved in the UFC: the fighters, the management and the fans. You know, the men who conceived of the sport, supported it and actually make it possible.
Alas, it was once “men build; women decorate”. Increasingly however, it is now “men build; women dismantle”.
You go girl.
Related posts
Related Video
Male Psychology
10m 19s
(Clip from Intimacy. Interview with Angry Harry.)
I had many of these same thoughts the first time I saw Kim refereeing a match.
One thing we do have to understand though is that the UFC has no control over the hiring and use of referees…that’s the sole domain of the State Athletic Commission, not the UFC.
Since all 50 State Governments have a no discrimination hiring policies, I’m surprised we haven’t seen more women referees as of yet.
One more thing – I have also noticed that Kim has only been given fights in which she is taller and bigger than the fighters she’s refereeing…so I do think somebody who is making these decisions is aware of the body mass/size/strength issue. They probably are aware of the criticism should she try to referee a heavyweight match and be unable to intervene when necessary between two large men.
She’s always given the Lightweight and Welterweight bouts (155 & 170), and for a woman she’s tall and most assuredly much heavier than 170.
I take your point on the referees being appointed by the state commisions, the logo is on the ref’s t-shirts after all. I should have made it clear that ref’s are imposed on the UFC but I thought the UFC might have some say in the suitability of ring personnel.
I also take the points about Kim’s height and weight but this is a little misleading as it implies some sort of pound-for-pound equivalence between men and women of the same height and weight.
Generally (and almost universally) speaking, a man of 170 pounds is not the same as a woman of 170 pounds in terms of strength or toughness. There is simply no comparison, with men being far stronger and having body mass that is distributed differently to women. This includes more muscle versus fat, for example.
The idea of Kim successfully interposing and stopping Thiago Alves in full flow is frankly laughable. This is bad for everybody, particularly an unconscious fighter.
Agreed on all counts. I only point it out, because I think someone high up there is making sure she’s not outsized in there…wouldn’t want the token referee to get embarrassed on live TV and expose the lie that women referee’s are “Equal” and all that.
Kinda like when they matched up Billy Jean King with a washed up, over-the-hill Bobby Riggs.
Will be interesting to see how it all pans out. A female ref WILL complain that it’s discrimination that she’s not yet officiated a heavyweight bout…
Does the State Athletic Commission allow male referees to ref female MMA fights?
Hello MWM
Looking forward to the new video “Intimacy”….
When is it due to out? Can’t wait to see the rest of it to be honest. The clip certainly looks good! I noticed you pick up on the intrusion of Women into every Male space that’s available and more. I have to admit that it’s all getting beyond a joke, and I for one am looking forward to the day when something gives out. I’m sure it’s coming, and it just depends on how many Men and Boys wake up and smell the cooking.
Blaise
Hi Blaise,
Thanks for your comment.
“Intimacy” is due hopefully in July or August. For various reasons, it’s hard to be more precise than that.
R.
I’m convinced my friends. Manginism is nothing more than a fashionable form of macho posturing. Manginas support the selfish whims of women to prove they can TAKE IT.
And it’s the same for these guys in the ring. Deep down, they are uncomfortable with females exerting some form power over them. To be easy about something like that would go against masculine nature because men are the human species’ protectors. So like manginas, these male contestants want to put on an outward show they can take it.
But I think there’s more to this than meets the eye. (I learnt this off of you MWM.) We need to ask ourselves who benefits?
Politicians. As always. If the toughest guys (such as fighters) show no complaint at being under the control of women, then Joe Average will feel a little awkward in complaining about it too.
So women control men. And, of course, politicians control women by given them everything they want.
It means, in the end, more power for powerful.
Very interesting perspective. Female referees in the UFC are a travesty, for the reasons I’ve outlined here and in a previous article. But, as you point out, it is a useful travesty for certain groups. Well said.
1: Politicians. As always. If the toughest guys (such as fighters) show no complaint at being under the control of women, then Joe Average will feel a little awkward in complaining about it too.
Great point there, I totally agree with that perspective. I know how I feel on a day to day basis, and this is essentially how it makes me feel, besides really pissing me off!
I just hope we can turn this around on the feminazi’s of this world in some way. I’m sick and tired of being marginalised all the time to the benefit of the Mangina’s and Feminazi’s.
Like the comment!
Blaise
Men haven’t tended to focus on Men’s Issues because of several male qualities.
1) Honor
2) PROGRESSIVENESS. Men instinctively prefer to build and earn their way and earn respect rather than engage in the corrosive and troglodyte practice of sniveling, cheating entitlement. She is called Shiva the Destroyer for a reason.
3) Genuine capacity for justice and morality. For many females, justice and morality are transient abstractions and qualities to be opportunistically exploited rather than valued. Men actually accepted, internalized, appreciated and are remorseful about the injustice and immorality that arose from extreme racism and so tend away from it, as in the case of Men’s Issues. Many females, on the other hand, lack the genuine sense of injustice and wrongness inherent to men. These females are happy to exploit the social circumstances and rhetorically thrash men with false projections of racism on his part, while themselves engaging in absolutely ferocious, unmitigated, flagrant and insidious racism. What, for the life of me, in all of this gender war, I simply cannot understand, is why Female Racial Supremacy is not cluster bombed into oblivion, just as was done to White Racial Supremacy. Feminism is, on it’s face, simply as a word itself, Racism. Why is this not dealt with? If Racism is wrong for any, it is wrong for all. The feminazi political factions, that is, the Democrats in the US and the ‘Labor’ Party in the UK, are defined by their rabid racism. They are fundamentally racist. This is their core attribute. R-A-C-I-S-M. RACIAL PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION. Women’s _______ is RACISM. “Affirmative Action” is RACISM. R-A-C-I-S-M against PEOPLE- BOYS and MEN. Hold these rabid RACIST harpies ACCOUNTABLE.
Kim’s doing fine in there, and she will continue to do fine — so long as she doesn’t have to break up some out of control heavyweights.
BTdubbs, male refs “feel up” female fighters already. No SH suits yet.
Well Rad
Probably more money in what she’s in right now than the front line eh?
Or collecting refuse, or building houses, or fighting fires, or and endless amount of heavy and dangerous work you care to mention that MEN do, and often die as a result.
And if she was to get hurt, then you can guess the outcome without much imagination. Along with the mangina’s that would come running to her aid.
Blaise
Tell you what else I find worrying. Those fighter guys were all hairless. It appears they don’t want to go into a ring with hair on their bodies. Body hair – a masculine quality – is something to be removed.
A sign of our feminized times, heh?
I just hope they don’t start having women fighters in the Octagon (quite possible now they have bought out Strikeforce).
I find the sight of ‘female’ athletes such as Venus Williams grunting around a tennis court bad enough, but watching two muscle bound women beating each other is utterly perverse.
Meanwhile, white knight Dana White makes a public apology for Joe Rogan calling a female reporter a c*** on an internet forum :
http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2011/6/6/2209551/dana-white-issues-public-statement-regarding-joe-rogan
This just shows the feminist mentality doesn’t it…Not that we don’t know how they operate already.
It has to be said if MRA’s checked out forums of feminists and their counterparts, then I’m sure their is plenty to throw back. It’s tit for tat at the end of the day, but it seems the only way to break down their pathetic argument.
It’s like MWM says, “It’s equality when it suits them, and preferential treatment the rest of the time”, typical of the spoiled western women’s mentality in this day and age.
Their argument is being broken down day by day, and more and more men are becoming sick and tired of the same old flawed, biased rhetoric that they promote.
Blaise
Females reporting on MMA, working within MMA or interacting with men involved in MMA, is bad news for MMA.
Now that the UFC is a big enough and juicy enough target, I imagine that lawyers are circling like sharks, waiting for the inevitable stream of litigation courtesy of this or that affronted female.
Yes…totally agree MWM
You can see them rubbing their hands together as we speak. Women’s issues are a major cash cow in this day and age. The poor, delicate, hard done by brigade of this world. Nothing could be further from the truth, as we all know.
Blaise
Hmm, I wasn’t even aware there were female referees in the UFC (admittedly I haven’t watched in awhile)but I do recall arguing with mates watching some pay per view bout or other at the bar awhile back as to whether women would try to bring the whole thing down for it’s hatred of women (Octagon girls) and it’s horrible violence that is both “indicitive of men’s nature” and enjoyable by them (so it’s a two-for when they ruin it and get attention for doing so. Or whether they would ruin it by forcing their way in because it’s lucrative.
” Remember you heard it here first: the introduction of female referees will inevitably lead to the abolition of the UFC Octagon girls. ”
I think that to humiliate man even more, before the abolition of the UFC Octagon girls we are going to have to stand the introduction of the UFC Octagon boys to please the sick mindset of the today feminised woman… What you call toxic woman.
When discussing Women’s Rights and men’s involvement, I wonder if what’s going on is a false presumption on the men’s part that if they are championing Women’s Rights, then by default there must be men out there championing quite the opposite?
Feminists, like all leftists groups, must have villains to blame everything on. It’s a mob mentality brilliantly pointed out by Ann Coulter’s new book Demonic that demonstrates how the Left organizes these mobs to suit their agenda, and the need for a scapegoat, however real or fictional, is an absolute must. I wonder, then, if men get caught up in the emotional argument rather than the merits of what feminists are saying?
Men are utterly fantastic at thinking of everybody and everything except themselves. They strive and fight for everybody’s rights apart from their own. The number of men actively involved in women’s rights (or even animal rights) dwarfs the numbers of men who have ever even thought about men’s rights.
It’s our undoing.
Hi there, first visit on your blog. Im an Italian MRA who have been a fan of the UFC from about the 2002-2003. I never watched it on cable because it was never aired here, but i always downloaded it, along with other events, like Pride, Hero, Dream and others. Anyway, you’re spot on saying that this is the end of the sport: the first time i’ve seen this female referee, i knew that was it, the end of me “being a fan” of the UFC. Now i only download some events, the most intersting ones, and skip quickly to the end of the fight, because i dont want to see another “men’s only” space being invaded by another female who “exert her authority” on male fighters.
I thought the UFC would’ve never get this low, but i recognize -because i’ve read from feminist sources- that the next battlefield for the feminist is Men’s Sports. It is happening everywhere: here in Italy a B League soccer team appointed a female as a coach some years ago, and the same president wanted to bring the first female soccer player (a lesbian german) to play in the Pro League. In the NBA also everything is going down as well, they already had a female referee and Dennis Rodman years ago was fined because he made a joke about her, and now more and more often they devising plots to put females on the NBA All Star Weekend (dont the WNBA already have their ASW ? why the need to invade men’s one?). Also, on the ESPN website, last years David Stern said that he see a woman playing in the NBA in the near future.
This is a very long argument, and veyr important, because Men’s Sports are the very last “bastion” of male’s only spaces, where the Sportsmen represents a symbol of strong masculinity for the young men to look up and build their own masculinity. The feminists understood this, and want to destroy this last “hold” for men to build their own Male Identity. They already did this in the workplace, in the military, and now they’re targeting men’s sports.
For this reason, i consider myself a “former fan” of the UFC (not that they were getting money from me anyway, mind you…), and i will boycott any company that let women destroy it from the inside for advancing some sick and depraved sort of “sexual equality”.
Btw, i’ve seen that your article has been posted on the Sherdog forums, and every single dimwit there is against your ideas. But thats not surprie, since they had a specific rule to “censor sexist (against females) posts”, and they have a thread for “females with guns”. There must be some sort of strong latent homosexuality in men who are attracted to females with guns.
Bye
Riccardo
Thanks for this comment. I agree with your examples of the invasion of male spaces in sports, amateur and professional.
As for Sherdog, I didn’t know this was posted there, but I am not surprised in the slightest that men (in particular) would be against anything at all that would make them feel like they were offending women.
This is the male mentality that has been so successfully created amongst most men: to support yourselves as men; to voice concern about female abilities, to seek to be men-only in any capacity whatsoever; to even mention the crazy idea of men’s rights; all of this is misogyny and can’t be allowed.
As Angry Harry says, most men are simply not aware that there is some part of their psyche that’s missing. They can’t see the world as it is for men, but only as women choose to see it.
If women decided that they’d like to start using male public toilets, these same men would cite discrimination against women if you were to suggest that male-only toilets are a good idea and should stay men-only. If you were to then suggest that if male-toilets are discrimination, then so are female toilets, they’d call you a pervert. It is the male-condition and it’s not going away anytime soon.
Yep, and about men’s toilets, i’ve read somewhere that in some Sweden colleges they have only two types of toilets: women only, and mixed. So men dont have a men’s only toilet. This is what i’ve read, but i dont have any official article to back it up, i would like to know some MRA from Sweden that could give me some info on this.
Btw, i have no doubt whatsoever that feminists are going to totally destroy men’s sports, they know that without men’s only spaces men dont develop a fully grown Male Identity. This is the reason they want to invade them. For this reason, i dont even care much about women’s abilities in some field. Like this female referee in the UFC: i dont care if they put some female freakish giant who could kicks the male fighters’ ass. I would still be against it, it is not the set of skills, it is their very same presence which is harmful.
Society must leave some places where men can join other men in some activity without having to be subjected to the presence of a female. I have to give it to feminists though: they are extra fine psychologists, they know exactly what buttons to push to force average men into mental-submission (the men at the top probably knows all of this feminist strategy very well, and are actively pushing it to weaken the competition from other lower-class men).
I’ve been boicotting so many things over the years, and every year i add something to the list. First it was Cinema, i stopped going from 2000, then it was Tv, i unplugged from 2003, then the number of “playable” videogames started shrinking too, and now also the watchable men’s sports are starting to shrink. I’m sure this is the start of the end for the UFC, next it will be women fights mixed in the mens’ cards, and then some NBA team looking for publicity will hire some WNBA chick to fill the arena with people eager to see the “novelty”.
Its going to be tough in the next 10-20 years, im sure many of us will remember the 2011 like the “good old days”: its going to be that much bad in the future. My list of things to boycott will grow even bigger, at the end i will probably “unplug” from society altogether, and live like an hermit.
Mixed toilets and women-only toilets sounds highly probable to me, especially in Sweden. But to be honest, nothing (and I mean absolutely nothing) surprises me about what men will accept and tolerate and even support regarding their own maltreatment. It is the single most important reason Feminism has been so successful and will continue to be.
I asked in another article, that if airlines made further rules to “protect” children from men on planes:
I’m working on an article at the moment directly addressing this and looking at possibly the only way men are going to survive Feminism. The ironic thing, is that the method doesn’t even involve most men at all. If it needed the support of a large number of men it would simply be a non-starter. Sad but true.
As for the UFC and NBA, absolutely. Women don’t even need to invade these sports, they’re invited in by men. I think it’s time to refocus on tackling Feminism in a way that might actually work. Garnering support from more men is probably not that way. As it stands, too many men are more Feminist than the Feminist’s they emulate.
Great to hear your viewpoint Riccardo!
I hear what you are saying, and certainly, we can all see an invasion into the male only spaces left. One of my favourite sports, being motor sports, you now see female commentators seeping through the gaps.
It’s almost akin to men signing up for needlework classes, and making out that they are in some way being oppressed by their lack of representation in that area.
Extreme I know, but basically that’s the feminist mentality.
I personally will keep on fighting this cancer amongst us, because at the end of the day, it’s the ones who stick their necks out, and fight back against this stealth psychology that they force upon the human race, that will ultimately rejoice in the crumbling of their sick ideology.
We won’t appeal to happily married men or ones in a happy relationship for very obvious reasons. It’s only when they have suffered at the hands of feminist driven injustice that they will come looking, and come looking they will!
Keep chipping away at their corrupt facade and enjoy the ride.
Blaise
Another dying male-only space is the barber shop. THAT’S now been invaded by women as well.
Just reverse the psychology on them at every given opportunity. Point out like “MWM” does about the issues they truly rely on to bamboozle people, and decipher their rhetoric, destroying their argument.
Show them up for what they really are, but don’t waste your time meeting them on their turf, I wouldn’t even give them air time to respond. They are the spoiled false entitlement brigade of our societies.
When I say use reverse psychology, I mean target their sacred areas of female only environments, and kick up the biggest wave of disapproval you can muster. Show them up for what they really are…we don’t need to invade their spaces literally to begin with, just apply for positions based upon discrimination and sexism, which is all they are doing!
The biggest card they use is “sexism” and “discrimination”, and that psychology can be reversed if enough voices come together, and are prepared to work together.
Blaise
MWM said:
“I’m working on an article at the moment directly addressing this and looking at possibly the only way men are going to survive Feminism”
When can we expect to see this article MWM? I’m looking forward to seeing something new from you to be honest.
It will be interesting to hear your perspective on how you think we can survive feminism…
Blaise
As soon as time allows. Hopefully by next month.
I can think of one place that is increasingly becomming male-only – elevators. There was a *really scary story* here at the college I go to that men were sexually assaulting the female students on elevators. There have been many times since then that I have walked up to an elevator and whatever woman was already there waiting would walk away and take the stairs as soon as she realized that we would be riding together.
Ironic, because you should be the one to walk away.
I used to feel like I should give way, but not any more.
At one time I would have felt uncomfortable for the female, but not any more.
Today from personal experience women aren’t the frail scared creatures the media would have you believe. They regularly walk two abreast with pushchairs and expect you to walk in the road, almost like they have some divine right to expect you should do so.
Only the other evening I saw a crowd of women in the distance, walking up towards me in a drunken manner as I decided to cross over the road. I preferred to stay clear of the rowdy comotion that they were creating. Upon a couple of them seeing I was avoiding their display, they took it upon themselves to cross over and walk two abreast towards me.
These women aren’t scared in any way whatsoever! As I came nearer, I just held my position and let them walk around me, when they could see I wasn’t prepared to be intimidated.
That was a turning point for me, and the very last time I will be chivalrous towards females that don’t in any way deserve or appreciate it.
They hog sidewalks at college campuses, also. I routinely witness sorority girls forcing male professors to walk around them, through the grass, and into flower bed mulch. One time I kept walking and ran directly into one of them, as a result of being fed up with going around. It nearly knocked her down. We collided — *hard*. It knocked her backward about 3 feet. Needless to say, she tried to coerce all the other men around, who were total strangers, to engage in violence in her honor. Her extremely load outcry of, “Watch it creep! Do you always hit girls?”, was nothing more than what I call the “distressed female mechanism”. That day, I really did nearly get in a fight due to her playing damsel in distress. It was a matter of neither of us moving over. She assumed that all men ALWAYS walk through the grass if women are on the sidewalk and two-abreast.
Imagine if the UFC involved nothing but female fighters. Now, imagine that the exact same level of extreme violence was involved (the blood, the swolen-shut black eyes, everything) but, rather, against only women, while men made up a large portion of the audience paying to see it. Now, imagine that it were men who were protesting the existence of this sport on the basis that it was an example of “hatred of men”. It isn’t hard to disarm a feminist’s hateful illogical ideas.
@Ben
Her extremely load outcry of, “Watch it creep! Do you always hit girls?
——————————————————-
That’s the standard spoiled brat response Ben isn’t it?
the one we know will always come into play, rather than either laugh it off or a mutual apology.
They are so ignorant that they actually believe they have been wronged in some way. It’s down to their lack of basic manners, which says something about their education doesn’t it.
I would always advocate standing your ground…I actually had to stop in my tracks a few weeks back, when again two females with pushchairs, oblivious of anything other than themselves walked at me.
I stopped still as one actually tried to barge me with the pushchair. I asked where exactly she thought I should walk…upon which, she became rather embarrassed and actually said sorry.
You could call that a small gain of some sort, but I don’t see why we have to experience that in the first place, in a so-called civilised society. Kind of lets you know how degraded society has become, and certainly feminism is the biggest culprit.
@Ben
“It isn’t hard to disarm a feminist’s hateful illogical ideas”
——————————————————-
Totally agree Ben…just flip it round at any given opportunity and watch them squirm for a logical, reasonable response. In the vast majority of cases there won’t be one that they can provide.
And I, like yourself, believe that’s certainly a good way to spoil their argument. And just watch their faces implode with rage once point out the obvious.
I am in the US; I take it you are in the UK? I have never heard those called pushchairs before. Are those the baby strollers? I wasn’t sure; please excuse my lack of worldliness. It is nice to meet you and thank God for the internet and its outstanding contributions to the MRM! I am so glad to hear from you and other men affected by western misandric culture. We have misandry here in the States, like you do over there. It goes on and on. Once you are aware of the issues, you spot misandry everywhere, all the time.
@MWM–I followed your hypertext walk away. Thanks for your fantastic work and unshakably pristine insight!
It looks like the feminists are going to destroy the UFC, doesn’t it?
Do you have any contact Email? cause i have some pics of New York ads where men are portrayed like rapist,molester etc, and some ads about women ending their pregnancy without responsability, literality the ad say”feel unfortable? are you late? is your choice”
Why not let men gatecrash into women dominated workforce stating discrimination?
This rant is full of so much truth. I was looking for something wrong, something to pick at. I’ll have to come back later.