Just a quick note to publicise the fact that newly registered bigot Nicole Fabian-Weber, a less-than talented writer on Cafe Mom, The Stir, has capitulated somewhat to the new power of the Men’s Movement and re-edited a hateful article she wrote earlier this month.
And here is the revised current page, which is no less abhorrent in my opinion, but shows an effort (no doubt under duress) to reduce the intensity of her hateful words.
Note the Revisions:
Original: ““I must admit, I’ve always admired a woman who has the cojones to cut off a man’s weenus.”
New: “You seriously have to wonder about woman [sic] who has the cojones to cut off a man’s weenus.”
Original: “So she did what any scorned, ballsy woman would do”
New: “So she did what any scorned, crazed woman would do”
Original: “Bad. Ass.”
New: Words removed.
Original: “Lord knows I wouldn’t be able to go through with it. No matter how much the bastard deserved it”
New: “Lord knows I wouldn’t be able to go through with something like this, no matter how much the woman-beating, philandering bastard deserved it.”
Original: “Then again, I’ve never been pushed to such a point in my life. I imagine women who are actually ready to go through with … the deed have reached a place where they literally have nowhere else to go. They’ve been abused — physically, sexually, and emotionally — for far too long, and cutting off the thing that essentially gives men their power seems like the best option. And it probably is.”
New: “Then again, I’ve never been pushed to such a point of desperation in my life. I imagine women who are actually ready to go through with … the deed have reached a place where they literally have nowhere else to go. They’ve been abused — physically, sexually, and emotionally — for far too long. I can only imagine that cutting off the thing that essentially gives men their power must seem like the only possible option to them.”
Original: “Do you think cutting off a man’s penis is a suitable punishment after enduring years of emotional and physical abuse?”
New: Words removed.
What does it mean?
Rather than outright man-hating and advocacy for sexual violence against men, the revised article is now merely toned-down man-hating and advocacy for sexual violence against men.
Further, there is no statement that edits have been made and neither is there an apology.
So, this counts as a sly attempt to revise the historical record and pretend that the offensive article was never written. However, it fails not only because the attempt to cover-up the offence is laughably poor, but also because the revised article is essentially no less hateful than the original.
Nicole the man-hater simply doesn’t get it. Or perhaps she does, and is changing the minimum amount needed to keep the hate alive, whilst not falling foul of her editors.
Still, in tackling misandry, the road ahead is long and as a wise man once said: “the journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.”
Massive Kudos goes out to Paul Elam of A Voice for Men whom I believe is responsible for yet another huge step forward for the basic human rights of men.