Just a quick note to publicise the fact that newly registered bigot Nicole Fabian-Weber, a less-than talented writer on Cafe Mom, The Stir, has capitulated somewhat to the new power of the Men’s Movement and re-edited a hateful article she wrote earlier this month.
Here is the original article which earned her a well-deserved registration as a misandric bigot on Register-Her.
And here is the revised current page, which is no less abhorrent in my opinion, but shows an effort (no doubt under duress) to reduce the intensity of her hateful words.
Note the Revisions:
1)
Original: ““I must admit, I’ve always admired a woman who has the cojones to cut off a man’s weenus.”
New: “You seriously have to wonder about woman [sic] who has the cojones to cut off a man’s weenus.”
2)
Original: “So she did what any scorned, ballsy woman would do”
New: “So she did what any scorned, crazed woman would do”
3)
Original: “Bad. Ass.”
New: Words removed.
4)
Original: “Lord knows I wouldn’t be able to go through with it. No matter how much the bastard deserved it”
New: “Lord knows I wouldn’t be able to go through with something like this, no matter how much the woman-beating, philandering bastard deserved it.”
5)
Original: “Then again, I’ve never been pushed to such a point in my life. I imagine women who are actually ready to go through with … the deed have reached a place where they literally have nowhere else to go. They’ve been abused — physically, sexually, and emotionally — for far too long, and cutting off the thing that essentially gives men their power seems like the best option. And it probably is.”
New: “Then again, I’ve never been pushed to such a point of desperation in my life. I imagine women who are actually ready to go through with … the deed have reached a place where they literally have nowhere else to go. They’ve been abused — physically, sexually, and emotionally — for far too long. I can only imagine that cutting off the thing that essentially gives men their power must seem like the only possible option to them.”
6)
Original: “Do you think cutting off a man’s penis is a suitable punishment after enduring years of emotional and physical abuse?”
New: Words removed.
What does it mean?
Rather than outright man-hating and advocacy for sexual violence against men, the revised article is now merely toned-down man-hating and advocacy for sexual violence against men.
Further, there is no statement that edits have been made and neither is there an apology.
So, this counts as a sly attempt to revise the historical record and pretend that the offensive article was never written. However, it fails not only because the attempt to cover-up the offence is laughably poor, but also because the revised article is essentially no less hateful than the original.
Nicole the man-hater simply doesn’t get it. Or perhaps she does, and is changing the minimum amount needed to keep the hate alive, whilst not falling foul of her editors.
Who knows?
Still, in tackling misandry, the road ahead is long and as a wise man once said: “the journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.”
Special Note
Massive Kudos goes out to Paul Elam of A Voice for Men whom I believe is responsible for yet another huge step forward for the basic human rights of men.
Apologies to those who commented on this post, they have been lost. My ISP had an outage and lost some sql data before my nightly backup could run. C’est la vie.
Great pickup, but just another claytons apology just like that other Jenna bigot we roasted. Maybe we need to apply a little more pressure to have the entire article removed. I did notice in their community posting article that it left the road open for some obnoxious article as being C’est la vie..
Have you read the latest on InMalaFide on MRA’s, a real rage rant..
Just had a look. Not sure what to say about it.
The Men’s Movement is bigger than MRAs and bigger than PUAs. It matters not if these groups are at odds with each other, it’s still about betterment for men – a man just chooses his poison.
The problem comes when these two groups being at odds saps energy from the real battle against real enemies. I say just accept the different mindsets and get on with your own business. That’s why I doubt I’ll ever cover PUA issues here. There are better-tasting, more substantial and more satisfying fish to fry.
Some…English news!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2053348/Maria-Topp-bit-boyfriends-testicles-face-5-years-jail.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
It’s the newly empowered in-thing. Gotta go with the trend, you know.
I never quite understand how this happens and am always shocked by the lack of reprisals. I would kill a woman who did ths to me without a second’s hesitation or so much as a flicker of remorse, I always assumed this was one of those universal things and that any man would do the same, yet it never seems to happem.
Look at the way they backpeddle. Women are natural cowards.
This vindicates one thing: they’ve never had to fight for anything. Without willing men to fight their battles for them, feminism would be nowhere today.
Brussels, everyone is a natural coward. Cowardice is something that must be overcome by each individual. I would agree, though, that it’s seen as some kind of sin (or in more modern language, “victim blaming”) to pose to a woman that she has control over the emotion of fear or circumstances regarding her own safety, thereby keeping women in the comfortable state of cowardice.
Mmmmm, not sure Eric. I involve myself a lot in political discussions on newspaper talkboards, most typically on gender-related issues (although not always).
I’ve found that men taking the side of feminists will not back down that easy, even if they might do eventually. Women, on the other hand, flake out rather quickly.
It got to the point once when as soon as my first comment on a discussion thread appeared, some participating feminists with whom I’d argued with on earlier occasions would disappear.
And this includes female journalists — especially journalists.
I think what we’re seeing here is female nature. Women are not natural protectors, and therefore not natural fighters.
I love the presentation because I didn’t get to read the original. Toning it down was obviously a way of trying to let the hatred slip under the radar, but we’re smart enough to see through the guise. Well done.
Is it really a mark of the “power” of the men’s rights movement that this woman amended her remarks, or is she merely being sensitive to what she was saying? See, I don’t really buy the notion that MRAs are that powerful yet. Until I see someone like Joy Behar and the other women on The View, for instance, get called out for their misandric behavior about a man getting maimed and having his severed penis destroyed in a food disposal, by virtue of the influence the Men’s Movement has, I would say we have a long way to go.
Maybe this is a first, but let’s not get carried away.
I doubt this woman has any sensitivity in that sense. She knows what she’s saying and is happy to say it. Even her edits say the same thing.
The victory is that she made any edits at all. That wouldn’t have happened even a year ago.
Why? Because men would have said nothing and done nothing. That is no longer the case as some men will now make things very uncomfortable for bigots like Nicole.
Nicole is an entreé for the MRM. She is a head-on-a-pike example to the other ‘wimmin’ out there who want to peddle the same old BS they’ve been getting away with for decades.
The bigger fish are to follow and the eating will be good.
Here are 3 empowered women from the past that Bigot Nicole Fabian-Weber might have praised on CafeSociopath had she ever heard of them (not her fault though; they don’t appear in women’s studies texts for some reason or other):
Evelina Steele – “Wife Murders Child Of Eleven Years Because She Kissed Father Too Much.” (plus falsely accuses father of incest & mutilates the girl’s corpse in an unsuccessful effort to simulate a failed abortion).
http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2011/08/misandric-adademics-and-professionals.html
Georgette Brooks – Mom Hates Little Boys, She Says, So She Murders Her Son: Georgette Brucks – 1949
http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2011/10/mom-hates-little-boys-she-says-so-she.html
Mary Orban – Gender Cleansing in 1940
http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2011/07/gender-cleansing-in-1940.html
NO matter what sex,the point is this is a disturbed individual.Anyone that promotes and or takes pleasure in the pain or mutilation of another human being clearly has issues that require serious counseling and help,maybe even medication. It is very clear to me from reading several of this person posting that her cheese has clearly slid of the cracker long ago.