I think that one of the items on the men’s movement agenda is the prescription for the snappy comeback – the succinct, appropriate, easily-memorable, easily delivered response to the mighty river of Feminist misinformation so prevalent out there.
The important thing to my mind in countering the typical Feminist soundbite is to not dwell to much on the need to cite precise sources ad nauseum for every assertion you make. That’s not what’s required in debate like this.
Why? Because you’re not actually having a debate when you deal with a Feminist and/or Feminist misinformation. Instead, you’re dealing with assumed truth, factoids and emotional rhetoric; repeated lies that have undeservedly acquired the hallmark of truth.
You are dealing with people who think they know the story of men and women and think they know what Feminism stands for. They think they know that:
- 1 in 4 women is beaten by a man
- 1 in 4 women is raped by a man
- 1 in 4 women is sexually harassed by a man
- 1 in 4 women is decapitated by a man
- 1 in 4 women suffers all of the above
- 1 in 4 women suffers all of the above and then some
- 1 in 4 women is [insert some kind of abuse by a man here]
People are so convinced that they know this stuff that they long ago stopped questioning themselves about what they believe, if they ever did. So, being a Feminist is like preaching to the choir and the rules of rational debate don’t apply, what with all the head-nodding and Amens going on. No feminist makes a citation when she says “1 in 4 women are raped” or one of the other lies, she just says it and relies on the cultural belief in male evil to carry it through.
This means that the backup for your case does not need to come in the form of a citation, rather, it needs to come in the form of calmness under pressure and like-for-like verbal ammunition.
What you do need to know is that what you say is true, but you don’t need the page number and year of a specific report. Leave that for websites you can point to and other resources as a secondary force. It’s the immediate responses that we’re discussing here.
Personally, I’m not too concerned about the snappy comeback (and don’t profess to be good at it, either). I like to focus on overall strategy rather than the many smaller battles that also occur, although all of it is important.
Dr F covered the idea of men increasing their competence in this area and I think that there’s a case to create a resource that focuses on short and on-point responses. There may already be such a thing and if so, that’s great and make sure to point it out. For now, these are a few of my own suggestions for dealing with Feminist BS and I welcome anyone to supply their own. I may soon put some of the questions and answers submitted up on its own page or in the Glossary.
_______________________________________________
[FEM]: You have a problem with women / You hate women / You are a misogynist.
- No, I only have a problem with Feminists
- Love women, hate Feminism
[FEM]: If you are against Feminism, you are against women’s rights.
- That’s like saying “if you’re against the KKK you are against white people”
[FEM]: How can you compare Feminism to Nazism? / How stupid are you to suggest Feminism and Nazism are similar? (info)
- If the shoe fits…
- You’re right, there is one difference: Feminists wear heels and Nazis wear jackboots.
[FEM]: Not all Feminists are the same / Not all Feminists are like that. (info)
- No, they’re not all the same, but they’re all part of the same problem
- No, but they’re all on the same team
- Yes, but the Feminists that matter are all like that
- Maybe not, but I never found a Feminist, or cockroach, or any other pest that I liked
- Not all cockroaches are the same, either, but I still don’t want one in my house
- All live on the same street and turn a blind eye to the Ms Crazies living next door
[FEM]: Look it up in the dictionary: Feminism is about equal rights. (info)
- Then why do no Feminists campaign for Selective Service for women?
- No, it’s about equal rights when it suits, and preferential treatment most of the time
- You’ve got to laugh at the dictionary definition of Feminism
- That’s like saying the KKK is about racial harmony
- No, the dictionary definition is a poor pretence. Feminism is about female supremacy.
- Feminism is about increasing female power. Indefinitely. Forever.
- It’s not about equality or equal rights, it’s about more and more for women no matter what. It never ends.
- Feminists never stop when equality is achieved, they always push for more for women
- But that’s not the reality. For example, women make up about 55% of University entrants. Why aren’t Feminists complaining about this inequality?
- The dictionary definition is a fantasy so that Feminists sleep easier at night
- If only that were true…
- Somebody ought to complain about that definition, it couldn’t be further from reality.
- Yeah, right. And if I see a woman eating a steak and she says, “I’m a vegetarian”, should I accept that too? (credit MRA)
- A person who eats meat can’t call themselves a vegetarian. (credit MRA)
- That’s like somebody eating a steak but still calling themselves a vegetarian. (credit MRA)
- That’s like saying to a woman who’s eating a steak:
“Hey, I see you like steak”.
And she says, “No, I’m vegetarian. Look it up in the dictionary.”
You say, ” I know the definition of vegetarian, but you’re not it”.
She says, “I’m a vegetarian no matter what I eat.” (credit MRA) - That’s like saying to a woman who’s eating a steak:
“Hey, I see you like steak”.
And she says, “No, I’m vegetarian”.
You say, “But how can you be vegetarian? You’re eating meat.”
And she says, “Are you deaf? I’m vegetarian. Look it up in the dictionary.”
You say, “Yes, I know the definition of vegetarian, but you’re not it”.
She says, “I’m a vegetarian no matter what I eat.” (credit MRA)
[FEM]: Feminism was created by women.
- That’s like saying that pigs created the bacon industry. (info)
[FEM]: Feminism has been positive for women.
- Yeah, and the bacon industry has been positive for pigs
[FEM]: We needed Feminism.
- Yeah, like a hole in the head
- No-one ever needed a disease.
[FEM]: Feminism is not monolithic.
- No, but it may as well be
- Neither is a swarm of wasps
[FEM]: There are many different kinds of Feminism.
- There are also many different kinds of cancer

[FEM]: Those radical Feminists are a small minority, they are not representative, they are extreme. (info)
- Those women sold millions of books. that’s ‘representative’ of a lot of hatred
[FEM]: Not all women are like that. (info)
- Maybe, but too many are
- No, but enough of them are to make it Russian Roulette out there
- Great, now how do I spot the good ones?
[FEM]: 1 in 4 women is raped.
- And 1 in 4 women spreads false statistics
- Wow, that made-up stat is still making the rounds? You don’t buy that do you?
- You do know that the rape figures are only allegations not convictions for rape, right? (info)
[FEM]: We live in a rape culture.
- No, we live in a false rape culture.
- The only difference between a good, well-respected man and a ‘rapist’, is the lack of an accusation from a female.
- You’re right, boys have little protection from female rapists
- You’re right, our culture excuses female rapists
- That’s true, just recently yet another woman was let off lightly for raping a boy
- No, we live in a culture where rape is one of the worst crimes there is. If it’s committed by a man.
- No, we live in a culture where rapists are amongst the lowest of the low
- Well, maybe we do, because when women rape boys, it gets called an ‘affair’ (info)
[FEM]: 1 in 4 women is a victim of domestic violence.
- And 1 in 4 women spreads false statistics
- Really? And what’s the figure for men?
- 1 in 6 men came from that same study (Home Office study 191)
- 1 in 6 men came from the same study, but the whole business of DV is inflated for shock value
- Don’t believe the hype, domestic violence is even defined as shouting in those figures
[FEM]: 2 women a week die as a result of domestic violence.
- And 1 man a week is killed
- And 1 man a week is killed, plus 2 more commit suicide (source: Erin Pizzey)
- 80 men kill themselves every week, 350 women die of pneumonia every week, we need some perspective. (info)
- And about 3,500 babies are killed by their mothers in abortions every week, we need some perspective. (applies to UK. US stats from CDC is 15,000 per week)
[FEM]: Almost all domestic violence is perpetrated by men. (info)
- Well that’s only true if you ignore domestic violence perpetrated by women
- No most domestic violence is perpetrated by women but it goes unreported
- No most domestic violence is perpetrated by women, but men and children don’t report it
- No, only most reported domestic violence is done by men
- Most domestic violence against children is committed by women
- The domestic violence cycle stems from mothers violence against children, it generally all starts at her hands and that’s where the problem needs to be tackled
- Most domestic violence is caused and received by violence prone women. Look up Erin Pizzey.
- Well, Erin Pizzey started the world’s first women’s shelter and she disagrees with that (info)
- Erin Pizzey says that of the first 100 women she took into a domestic violence shelter, 62 of them were more violent than the men they left! (info)
[FEM]: Most serious domestic violence is committed by men.
- Most serious domestic violence committed by women is strangely not classified as domestic violence
- Tell that the the men and children that are killed every week by women
[FEM]: Most child abuse is committed by men.
- No, most child abuse is committed by women
[FEM]: Most child sexual abuse is committed by men.
- Oh, yes that’s right, men abuse children whereas women just have affairs with them. (info)
- Most prosecuted sexual abuse is by men, most child sexual abuse by women either goes undetected, or else is called an “affair”. (info)
[FEM]: If women ruled, there would be no war.
- If women ruled, there would be no anything. (info)
- There’d still be war, they just wouldn’t be any good at it
[FEM]: A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.
- I think you meant to say: “like a fish needs water”, in which case I agree
- You were doing great when you said: “a woman needs a man”, but it was downhill from there
- Please! If it wasn’t for men, women would be living in caves and wondering if their asses looked big in a grass skirt
- Wow, so it’s true: women like you do exist!
- Women wouldn’t even know what a ‘bicycle’ was if not for men
- You keep telling yourself that honey. Here, open this pickle jar, would you?
- A man needs a woman like a bank needs a robbery. (credit Fidel)
- A man needs a woman like a cheetah needs Nike’s. (credit Blaise)

[FEM]: Deadbeat dads are on the increase.
- Maybe, but they’ll never catch up with irresponsible mothers
- You’ve got to wonder why mothers make such poor choices
- You’ve got to wonder why mothers choose men who don’t want to be fathers. I mean if you were a bank, would you give a loan to someone who said they didn’t want to pay you back?
- It’s incredible. Man says “I don’t want kids”. Woman gets pregnant anyway. And we’re still surprised at the result.
- You’ve got to wonder about this. I mean, paternity fraud is a major cause of family breakdown, but when the man finds out and leaves, all we do is blame the dads!
[FEM]: A man should keep it zipped if he doesn’t want kids / He took the risk, he should pay the price / Well, if he didn’t want a child then he should have kept his pants on. (info)
- And women should keep their legs closed if they don’t want kids, not get abortions
- I agree, and if we ban abortion, we’ll have real equality in reproduction
- A woman shouldn’t have kids with a man who doesn’t want them
- No, fair is fair: he should have the same options she has. We don’t tell women: “keep you legs closed’” and leave it at that. We give her the pill and abortion
- Well, women have complete control of reproduction and with complete control, comes complete responsibility
- Yes. You’re quite right. I would always advise a man never to trust a woman when it comes to sex, since she might well unilaterally decide to use his sperm to ‘father’ a child. (credit Angry Harry)
[FEM]: It used to be legal for husbands to beat and rape their wives. (info)
- It’s amazing the false history Feminists try and paint. Do you really believe this stuff?
- Does anyone really think that our great grandfathers wanted to rape their wives? Please!
- It used to be legal for women to kill her husbands child. I think it was called ‘abortion’.
- Worse than that! ALL men used to beat and rape ALL women once a day. And twice on Sundays. It was the law.
- It used to be legal for a woman to commit adultery and then leave her husband and still make him pay her alimony. Actually, that’s the law now.
- It used to be legal for a woman to have a baby by another man and still make her husband pay for the child. Actually, that’s the law now.
[FEM]: Feminism helps men too / Feminism is good for men.
- No, it’s solely concerned with the welfare of women
- No, Feminism is bad for men too
- Feminism isn’t good for men or women,
- Yeah, and I heard that the KKK is good for black people
[FEM]: Men are afraid of women.
- Of course men are afraid of women, they pretend to like you and then they take all your stuff! (info)
- Well, if she wants you out of the house, then out you go. And if she doesn’t want you to see the children, then you don’t. Maybe men should be afraid of women! (credit Angry Harry)
[FEM]: Men are afraid of strong women.
- No. A strong women doesn’t need affirmative action. It’s the majority of women, the weak women that cause trouble for men
- No. Strong women are an asset, it’s toxic women that men are wary of.
- If only there was such a thing as a strong woman…
- Men have yet to encounter strong women, how could they be afraid of them?
[FEM]: Feminism started because women didn’t have the right to vote.
- Most men didn’t have the right to vote either, so why did women only focus on women’s right vote?
_____________________________
you.ve got to laugh at the dictionary defn of fem.
























Brilliant. I am going to contribute to this.
Good stuff ….
One to add in under the ‘ fish need a bicycle ‘ section.
‘ A man needs a woman like a bank needs a robbery ‘.
The above is not mine, but I did get it off a post on the MGTOW forum. Unfortunately, I don’t know who to give credit to.
Good one. Let me know if you find out who to attribute it to.
Cheers.
Ok, I found that this is attributable to someone called ‘Uio’.
Thanks.
That 1 in 4 women being decapitated by men thing made me lol
Rich Zubaty gave the perfect response to a feminist on his YouTube page when she reproached him for being a misogynist. He said, “Yeah, I hate women. But I wasn’t born hating them.”
I like the ironic sentiment that Feminists create misogyny.
Almost included this as an update, but it’s not quite accurate for general use. In most cases, men that might use such a comeback would not mean it.
Myth — I would say it goes beyond feminism to something deeper. It’s FEMINIZATION. Western culture has been suffering ever deeping feminization for 1000s of years. And feminism is an unavoidable political spin-off of our mass-feminization.
Men have lost the art of being men. Men exist today for getting laid. They seek top jobs or work their balls off in low-paid drudge for pussy. And pussy is how and why they love. A man loves a woman through her pussy. He’ll even put his life on the line for the woman he loves because she gives him her pussy. Western culture, with its millenea of invention and wealth creation, is the result of men doing things to please women, because men seek love.
Result? Women are the boss. THAT’S why we — MEN — have let feminism happen in the first place.
And bosses can be rather unpleansant people. They always seek to get their way. They usually do. Because whether it’s love or money, they’ve got what you need.
Modern man’s hatred for woman is not natural. But it might well be INEVITABLE in our modern age.
But the thing is, I don’t think that last part is true: I don’t think men have “hatred” towards women in general or even in significant part.
You’re probably right to a large extent about feminisation and men’s priorities. However, whatever friction there is between men and women is clearly not brought about because women are women, it happens because women are treated preferentially by the state compared with men with quite brutal repercussions.
Also, I think men’s achievements stand by themselves, they are not achievements to win women. Some maybe, but not most.
Is it fair to say that men “let” Feminism happen? That’s a big question. For example, if men reacted to misandry 50 years ago like we have in this case, would we be living in a non-Feminist world now?
I think so, but I can’t be sure because men now are not the way men were back then. In other words, whilst Feminism has crushed a great many men and even manhood itself to an extent, it also has some responsibility for creating a new breed of men who are very different to the men of 50 years ago. I’m one of those men and most men in the MRM are like that as well.
I’m rambling, but suffice to say that the men of old did not see themselves as men, but only as functionaries and servants to others – particularly women. There was no way for those men to oppose Feminism, the mental constructs didn’t exist.
But the men of today do increasingly see themselves as ‘men’, and Feminism is now being challenged. So, in a way, men are (ironically) stronger now than then and the real question is: have we achieved that strength too late in the day?
MWM, don’t get me wrong. I think Esther Vilar and Erin Pizzey for a start are two wonderful people. Wish there were more women with brains and deep understanding like them. I think ALL women have the potential to love men like these two ladies do.
The problem is, our western culture encourages selfishness in women, which I for one believe has now gone out of control. (And that we let it happen!)
My point is that it’s chicken and egg. The feminization has caused the rise of feminism, and the feminism is stimulating deeper feminization.
Of course, we all know there are vested political and corporate interests in keeping women selfish. I guess this is what our fight is about.
Excellent.
@Brussels Lout & MWM
I think both yourself and MWM have some valid points here…
I would agree that men are driven by the possibility of gaining access to the vagina. However, I don’t believe that’s their sole driving force for wanting fame and fortune in top jobs. Sure, it goes without saying that they are aware that sooner or later it will attract a mate…usually one that is prepared to loan her vagina to gain wealth by deception and government support, but as MWM mentioned; men are taking back the valid title of being a man in this age, and waking up to the discrimination that surrounds them.
I agree that feminisation has only promoted feminism in our world today…we were all sucked into it by our chivalrous demeanour, which the female of the species were all too aware of. The very mention of equality was enough to get men and boys scratching their heads in approval.
Unfortunately there are far too many males that are involved with the females and consequently, as you mention…will do anything to protect that bond. Of course, they will do anything until they have been taken to the cleaners; and only then will they reflect on what’s just occurred.
Women are only perceived as the boss because of political correctness…which I believe is also a feminist construct. If you put aside the idea of PC and just see things logically, then their whole BS empire has little authority over anyone. It’s only because of PC, that folk are shamed into believing they are doing something wrong by having an alternate opinion. Get rid of political correctness and call it out for what it is. It’s nothing more than a leverage tool to keep control of peoples minds; to keep them in check.
Once you get rid of that I believe many men will be free of shackles and start to say it as they see it, rather than fear of reprisal if they do…or lack of access to vagina if they do. PC, is the virus amongst us, and the thing that checks normal emotional responses to dominating forces.
Good article. I’ve found a useful source for handling yourself verbally with women is comedians. I am including a clip of a comic from the U.S. named Bill Burr being interviewed by a woman a local news show. He just has a way of keeping a woman on the defensive that is a joy to behold.
The conversation isn’t about feminism per se, but what I love about his approach is that as long as a woman acts civilized, so does he. But the minute she criticizes either him or men in general, he is all over it.
By the end of it, he pretty much takes the interview over. He uses the same strategy that women use on men. He doesn’t really defend himself, but constantly is on the attack, either questioning what the show’s host (Or women in general) say or do.
He also doesn’t mind going over the top just to get a reaction, as you will see at the end of the interview when he blames the affairs of Tiger Woods on the wife. He doesn’t even break a sweat as a whole studio full of women hoot at him.
Hope this is useful. Keep up the good work
http://www.themmpodcast.com/?p=380
Bill Burr is an MRA and then some. Love his comedy.
Definitely one of the funniest posts I’ve seen. Thanks for sharing. These will come in handy.
Off topic: I know you say a lot of men don’t agree with your views, but based on conversations I’ve personally had with men, a lot of them seem to hold your views. (But still – a lot of them don’t) I’ve noticed feminism is losing popularity here in America. You should youtube “Bill Maher politically incorrect feminism” and and its a great video of him totally owning feminists. You should watch the whole thing and keep in mind Bill Maher is very popular in the states so he influences a lot of people’s opinions.
Unfortunately, I think that only overt Feminism is “losing popularity”. The real cancer that is Feminism – the accepted falsehood of female oppression – is still as popular as ever and continues to drive legislation as usual and attack men as usual.
“If women ruled, there would be no anything”
That one literally made me laugh out loud. There’s way too much for me to remember all of it in one sitting, but that one is at the top of my list.
Great article.
ps. little OT: do you plan to write something about the McDonald incident ? I was reading many comments on various sites, and i found this one by a disgusting mangina:
http://www.eurweb.com/2011/10/video-after-mcdonalds-cashier-is-slapped-hes-caught-on-tape-beating-the-two-women-customers/
Read the comment of the dude “Red”…
Maybe will address the McDonald’s thing, but it’s been handled well elsewhere.
[FEM]: Look it up in the dictionary: Feminism is about equal rights.
This is really annoy me, they tend to use the dictionary to prove who they are, when a person or movement is attacked and can’t prove who,what they are is a perfect example of the lack of common sense in this movement, you don’t have to go to books to know who Martin Luther King, Lincoln, Einstein or Civil Rights movements are, they have their jobs done and there is prove of that.
A-Did Lincoln believed in equality?
B-yes
A-show me
B-Was the 16th President of the United States, serving from March 1861 until his assassination in 1865. He led the country through a great constitutional, military and moral crisis — the American Civil War —
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney opined that blacks were not citizens, and derived no rights from the Constitution. Lincoln denounced the decision, alleging it was the product of a conspiracy of Democrats to support the Slave Power [92]
Lincoln argued, “The authors of the Declaration of Independence never intended ‘to say all were equal in color, size, intellect, moral developments, or social capacity’, but they ‘did consider all men created equal—equal in certain inalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness’.”[93]
A-You are right
It’s that easy feminist, if you can’t prove any evidence of your equality the dictionary became just an excuse for your anti-men movement.
It’s like saying “not matter how we focus on women empowered giving them rights and privileges without responsibility that men don’t enjoy and we don’t care we are about equal rights between men and women take a look in the dictionary”
“I’m vegetarian but you saw me eating meat? look up in the dictionary for “vegetarian”"
Excellent! Updating the article soon.
Thanks. Used your great vegetarian analogy.
Well done! Haven’t laughed so hard in weeks.
Cheers,
HDfH
Great list, MWM
I’m saving this one for creative reference for those confrontational moments.
Anyway, I got to thinking and needed to add one to make a contribution. This one is of my own inspiration for your section…[FEM]: A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.
“A man needs a woman like a cheetah needs Nike’s”
Don’t know what you think? I reckon it’s got kind of a ring to it.
Added. Thanks.
Feminists are not EVEN original. Here’s a cutting from American local paper The Hartford Courant, December, 1898:
The place [Aragon, Spain] didn’t need an American consul any more than a cow needs a bicycle; for it had no trade with America, and no American tourist ever dreamed of stopping there.
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/414150.html
“If women ruled, there would be no war.”
-Tell that to Thatcher.
Well said Kendal…
It’s also true that men as a class get the blame for war but none of the credit, respect or recognition is given to men as a class.
[FEM]: Those radical Feminists are a small minority, they are not representative, they are extreme. (info)
Those women sold millions of books. that’s ‘representative’ of a lot of hatred.
Add that These books end up in women and gender study that are controlled by feminist, they get funds from the government they write these books and sell them in college to student and better still they have their own publisher so they are practically printing money.
Using radical feminist books in women and gender study is agree with the writer.
If you support women and gender study teaching radical notion like racism, communism, fascism or feminist you are supporting these same movement.
When you search names of radical feminist like Baleri Solanas or Andrea Dworkin you’ll end up in thousand of feminist website and blogs.
That ”You were doing great when you said: “a woman needs a man”,” line cracked me up for a good few minutes.
Anyway I’d like to contribute one I made up and I found pretty effective n the past:
[FEM]: Women were denied the right to have careers in the past
1. Strange, We didn’t hear women whining about their right to a ‘career” back when a ”career” was swinging a pick at a wall down a filthy hole for twelve hours a day.
I upset a local woman in my (she works there)supermarket in South East London by daring to disagree with her. A few nights later I went in to buy something and the landlady from the local pub was talking with her. As I entered the woman pointed at me and said. “There he is. Miserable b*****d.” The pub landlady, half drunk and aggressive decided she was going to show me up in front of all the shoppers in the queue. “What? Is that the one that argued with you?” She said. Loudly. Pointing at me and slurring slightly. She lurched towards me and I leant on the counter as unconcerned as I could. She stopped lurching at stared at me. “Don’t try to be casual darling. We know it’s not true. We can hear your balls shrinking from here.” The largely female queue sniggered in unison. “Don’t like strong women do ya, darlin’?” She said. More sniggers.
I stood up, looked her in the eye and said. “That sound you can hear is not my balls. It’s you intelligence shrinking.” A man in queue laughed.
“Yeah? Why’s zat?” Said the landlady.
“Because you think you are strong?” I asked her.
Man laughed again. Landlady looked flustered. She needed a come back. Something devastating. Her booze addled brain went into gear. It whirled, clicked and came up with: “Yeah. OK. But I bet if I offered you a shag you would still leap into my bed would’nt cha?”
“No.” I said. “And I will tell you a couple of reasons why. First of all, I have seen the kind of friends you attract — I gestured towards towards the supermarket employee who had put her up to this — and secondly, I have never been attracted to desperate mutton passsing itself off as lamb.”
Man in queue guffawed. A woman in the queue gasped. Both women went red. I sauntered away feeling on top of the world.
As you say, keeping calm is the key. It does not happen often like that, but when it does, it feels great.
Thank you this will help greatly in day to day attempts to spread the word and counter misandry.
Well done, Myth.
The fact that there will be no wars when women ‘rule’ is absolutely BS. War is a friction of political ideas, not personal conflicts between two people. Just because there aren’t enough women leaders of nations, that does not give feminists the right to say women do no wars. Proof: Thatcher and Roza Otunbayeva.
I presume no one heard about the latter. She led a bloody revolution in neighbouring Kyrgyzstan overthrowing the former President. One fact- She used violence.
PS: @mwm funniest article ever. Liked it!
Cheers.
Not only is it BS, my retort is that, “So, women are incompetent and dangerous to put in charge, since they’ll surrender at the first sign of an aggressor.”
Because that’s the quickest way to peace – Surrender.
Of course, that’s not what they’ll say. They’ll say that if women rule the world that there will be no war.
But anyone who’s ever watched women quarrel knows this is going to be anything but peaceful.
Interesting. I have to add one.
[FEM]: Almost all domestic violence is perpetrated by men. (info)
So we’re only concerned about preventing “almost all” domestic violence rather than all domestic violence?
Like it, but it bothers me that it buys into the falsehood that most dv is male.
I’ll look at adding a variation of this.
Thanks.
I like this article because all of this online stuff is important as theory, but can sound clumsy in everyday conversation.
It is really important to come up with a lot of short, succinct, vivid ways of expressing yourself that get your point across without sounding like a response in a school debate.
I am including a couple I like to use:
1. If women ruled, there would be no war.
The only reason women don’t start wars is because they lack ambition. They are perfectly happy destroying just one man’s life.
2. Any accusation about violence and men. Men start wars. Men commit violent crimes. Men are abusers.
Hmm, I wonder why their moms raised them that way.
3. This response is general, to any unhinged thing a woman says:
You and I are from different worlds. Mine’s a place called earth. You should visit sometime.
4.This one is just for the fun of it. On Halloween, walk up to woman dressed as a witch and say:
“So, no costume this year, huh?”
5. And finally, a more proactive approach. Instead of waiting to respond to her accusation, get the ball rolling yourself. Whenever a woman asks you for something (the time, a light, directions etc.) say,
I could do that, but I’m a feminist, and I believe in female-empowerment, not female-give-up-without-even trying-and-ask-the-nearest-man-ment.
Hope these are useful.
Thanks for the great work on your site.
SF
Great stuff.
Number 1 in particular had me laughing hard for a full minute!
I will set up a page soon of snappy comebacks, and your 1 and 2 belong on it.
Thanks for your support.
[FEM]:I don’t require men. I can do work on our own without any ‘chivalrous’ help. I have gal pals to help me, my strong mental strength to make everything possible. I am strong physically, ambitious, confident .Men only play videogames, eating chips,lazing around.
I will build my own house, with top notch electrical appliances, a luxury car,gold jewelleries.
[MAN]:Which gender invented car?Which gender discovered the concept of electricity which runs the world?As a matter of fact it is the men who work in mines,not women. So it is beacuse of men you get your gold jewellery.
The truth is men and women are made to coexist.
Does the Earth need the Moon? Sure it would spin around the sun without a satellite, but the tides would be gone and the rhythm of Nature would vanish.
Does a comedian need an audience? His jokes may amuse himself, but what would be the point?
Hence hating men is stupidity!
I want to suggest one:
[FEM]: Men treat women as sex objects.
1. Women treat men as ATM machines.
Thank you. Added here.
Going to translate this one aswell.
God bless.