Review for Django Unchained (2012) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1853728/ Now that's a very tricky movie to make a MRA review, that meaning a review of the misandric elements... – Jun 18, 8:48 AM
In the near future there will only be female professors in the University of Leipzig in Germany. All male professors are to be called Mrs... – Jun 17, 10:20 AM
"Prey for Rock'n'Roll" is a misandry fest from hell. All the men are vile sleaze bags except for the token white knight who punishes them.... – Jun 17, 6:11 AM
I agree that it is possible that female teachers could teach boys successfully in an all-boys setting. However, this story follows a line that is... – Jun 16, 8:59 PM
Great analogy. I cannot decide if I should join the Mississippi State Alumni Association now that I have graduated. It only costs $20.13 (commensurate with... – Jun 16, 7:55 PM
that movie was based on a book. I wouldn't be surprised if the misandric elements were from the book. – Jun 16, 5:53 PM
I find this vid impressive, because I believe it more likely to be viewed by non MRA’s, the general public, because it’s short, strong and simple.
The longer videos are great for people who want to know about men’s issues and the prejudice against us. But for those who are generally unconcerned, the overwhelming majority in society, this vid won’t push their attention/interest span, and so get the message spread more effectively.
Then they’re more likely to watch the longer ones and commence the journey through the red pill, in greater numbers.
Thanks for your opinion. Definitely noted for future work.
“Bones” is an incredibly misandric show. Apart from ZZTop’s Billy Gibbons being Angela’s father (how – she doesn’t even look Eurasian), they deride marriage, (Her father telling his future son in law to beware his daughter because she is a “spitfire” yeah, right) women in the lab are the competent ones while men are either accessories or stupid. I liked David Boreanaz but this show grated so much I stopped watching.
You’re one lucky man to have a wife like yours. Few and far between those women, extremely few.
I know we’ve discussed the male pill before on here, but I will reiterate that I can’t wait for the day. It’s long overdue, and about time that males were able to control their own fertility.
I can’t wait to see the smugness disappear from a good percentage of women’s faces. That will be priceless in itself, let alone the fact that we finally get a say in the making of a human life or not.
You never see many women shouting the male corner when this blatant disparity is obvious for all to see. They have never said anything about the disparity in retirement ages all these years either, but that’s for another time.
MWM, this falls right in line with your assertion of what feminism really is.
Equal treatment most of the time, preferential treatment when it suits them.
Women want full control over the decision to give birth, but none of the responsibility of what happens afterwards. Like the following:
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/10/30/canadian-mother-who-killed-her-two-children-in-uk-mansion-spared-jail/
I can’t believe television has come to this. “I would even marry you if that’s what YOU wanted.” Absolutely sickening. That’s why I don’t watch TV anymore either.
It feels that I have barely hung on to what little sanity I have left by getting rid of TV 6 years ago. Had I not, I’m sure it would have pushed me over the edge.
Hello Men. My apologies – I have probably got the ‘wrong’ bit in which to post this link – regarding the NSPCC’s advice brought forward today on how to spot sexual abuse in children – and my response.
The Ayes to the Right. The Noes To The Left xxx
http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=1906661541268886098#editor/target=post;postID=1898359523674958024
Oops, take 2
http://bollockstochildabuse.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/nspcc-issues-parental-advice-over-signs.html
Please ignore first posting.
Hi mwm, I didn’t see any new points from your previous reproductive rights vid. Apart from explicitly saying tv is propaganda, but you already convinced me of that.
What moved you to take time to rehash what you said before?
Perfectly and concisely describes the current reproductive dynamic approved of and encouraged by the femistate and its media..!
Indeed, this is why I never watch TV either.. Other than the new red dwarf series 10 on tonight at 9pm Dave..
That bloke is a classic pushover.. I look forward to the next series when he finds out after the marraige, that the baby is not his anyway! (But of course, he will “come to terms with it” and be the doting daddy anyway!).. Then, the series after that, when she finally throws him out and he gets the CS demands..
One thing though.. As can be seen by what I see as a likely development of this story.. The “male pill” would not solve any issues really would it?
Men who control THEIR OWN FERTILITY do not in doing so have control of A WOMANS FERTILITY..
What men must do, and this cannot be shied away from, is ensure they have control of womens fertility..
Indeed, it is a big need for all of society..
Allowing women to have sole control and power over reproduction, is a recipe for a fast return to the stone age..
How much did Obama’s blatant pandering to women help him in this election?
I’m not saying the candidates were great or anything but let us be honest here, Obama blatantly pandered to women all through out his term. Feeding women all sorts of compliments, telling them they are strong and how owes everything to his single mother, how women all have it rough, how the other party is “Waging a war on women” and will “take away their rights” (honestly looking back those are very extreme statements to make), how he will “end the wage gap and glass ceiling”. Do you think this blatant pandering helped him out during the election
MEN should have EQOAL legal rights to make all important decisions about OUR children. Its time for MEN to stop kowtowing to feminist bigotry and demand equal rights. There are no “equal rights” or any rights at all in “A woman’s right to choose.”
Bob wishes he did know.. If they are his kids.. The point is, men dont do they? And women have all the natural advantages of, for one thing, knowing just how many men COULD be the father! There are no “equal” rights, and nor can there be.. Best we can hope for is a fair balance of responsibilities.. Be careful who you potentially inseminate lads!
Check this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=U9a1C1qXHfM#!
Read the comments…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqNoBvawLk4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiqxdWDNZhE
Yeah, this little girl has gone viral. The media is falling over itself to show her “dominate” the other boys. In the interest of fair journalism, they should follow her career all the way and see where she ends up. When she hits high school, she won’t be playing this game anymore, she would get destroyed.
http://rt.com/news/sweden-toys-catalogues-gender-527/
I don’t think so it is sexist to show boys playing with guns,and girls playing with dolls.If a group of little boys and girls are let loose in a toy store,most(if not all) girls will play with dolls and boys will play with guns.This is not a sexist remark, this is natural
Yes, very true… The people behind this catalog are part of a group of thought reserved only for the most stupid and unrealistic among us.
Yes, this is a common theme around Christmas it seems. I saw one article where a 13 year old (she was indoctrinated early) fighting for equal gender representation in toy advetising. She was worried and wanted her little brother to know “it was OK to go into the kitchen” and that it is “OK to play with dolls and be nurturing and caring”.
Well, she’s been brainwashed early. Men don’t need encouragement to go into the kitchen: the world’s top chefs are men. And men don’t need to play with dolls to be nurturing, men are naturally nurturing. To suggest otherwise is feminist drivel.
I was watching CBS news this week and there was a guest being interviewed stated that women are much better problem solvers than men are and they would be better suited to work through political issues.
one hilarious comment I read was this
“its possible, i believe women are more right brained (ive seen some stats but not completely positive on that)… which is the “creative” side. creative thinking and problem solving go hand-in-hand, because for most problems you need to see something differently, approach it differently, etc.
”
so much BS. I guess women’s creativity is the reason every major innovation is by women isn’t it
Hello Men,
I very much hope that many of you will feel able to publicise this story any way that you can. A father, Terry Achane, is fighting for custody of his daughter, whom his (now ex-) wife gave up for adoption without telling him.
http://bollockstochildabuse.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/support-for-dad-terry-achane.html
MWM:
Off-topic (perhaps you could create a forum section for more in-depth and diverse discussion), but what do you think about the history of “women’s rights” with regards to it actually being necessary? What I mean is, were women actually economically discriminated against as is claimed by nigh bloody everyone and in need of gaining “rights” denied them before the twentieth century? (Which as we all know is the century when women gained all the “rights” of men without the responsbility, while yet still retaining the benefits of antiquated laws which were directly beneficial only for women[i.e. Mines Act of 1842, alimony laws, etc.]and societal norms, which continue to this day [Why in Lord's name are men here in America required to register for Selective Service at the threat of loss of their rights and imprisonment while women get a free pass? Utterly sickening])
AVFM has a forum, won’t do one here.
As for ‘women’s rights’, that term is meaningless and only serves to muddy the waters and allow misguided thinking. It also overly-empowers the State against everyone, but particularly men.
You should note that women’s ‘rights’ always seem to come at the expense of men’s yet men’s rights do not encroach on women.
As practiced today and in history, the correct term for ‘women’s rights’ is ‘female-privilege’. The correct term for ‘men’s rights’ is ‘human rights’.
Yes,
I’m simply confused on the subject, and the reason I’m asking is because it is cited incessantly as proof that women needed to “rise up” or whatever you want to call it. I suspect though that the lies permeating western society were around even then and women being payed less, if that was even true, was for obvious reasons and was mis-documented and overly-exaggerated… Was just curious if you had any insight on that time period in particular (perhaps I missed something in one of your articles or videos)
Thanks.
Interesting,
I’m simply confused on the subject, and the reason I’m asking is because it is cited incessantly as proof that women needed to “rise up” or whatever you want to call it. I suspect though that the lies permeating western society were around even then and women being payed less, if that was even true, was for obvious reasons and was mis-documented and overly-exaggerated… Was just curious if you had any insight on that time period in particular (perhaps I missed something in one of your articles or videos)
Thanks.
I really like „Bones“, and still I remember this scene as particularly annoying.
But the story goes on: Angela’s (the woman in the scene) ex-lover Jack, knowing that she is possibly pregnant from her new boyfriend Wendell, approaches her, looking for another, a last chance, telling her: “I’m your guy.” In the end, Angela (who, as it turns out, isn’t pregnant) finds this much more attractive than Wendell’s dutiful phrase “I would even marry you if that’s what you wanted.” Which leaves room for at least two possible interpretations:
1. Wendell tries his very best to do everything as he should, as Angela wants him to – and it still isn’t enough. Which shows us that even if it’s virtually impossible for a man to please and satisfy a woman, it’s still the man’s fault.
2. White knights just aren’t sexy…
The second interpretation isn’t misandric at all, and the series isn’t, either (at least from my point of view). Yes, the women are UNBELIEVABLY brilliant, but the men aren’t complete idiots as well. Like “The X-Files”, “Bones” casts the male and female roles contrary to common expectations. Katherine Brennan, “Bones”, is a brilliant scientist and a terrific analytical mind, but at the same time, she is a social simpleton, nearly an imbecile. Her male partner Booth is not only an ex-soldier, FBI-agent and the prototype of a “strong man”, he is also highly empathetic, and he is able to read social signals much better then Bones. The series makes much more fun of Bones than of him.
Still, your point is right – the women’s monopoly on reproductive power, to be funded by men, is destructive for children, for men, and for male-female-relationships. And the way “Bones” deals with this topic is really annoying. But at least, in the end of the “Bones”-episode, the really attractive man is not the man who does everything as he is expected to do, as she wants him to do – but the man who tells her clearly what HE wants…
indeed. women like to know they’re plaice..
I have a female friend who wants to have a baby against the guy’s wishes. It makes me question my friendship with her, because I feel that it is a moral issue. Not only does it affect the man, but also the child who will have to deal with a non-committal father. Too many women are setting the stage for fatherlessness through poor decision-making. As you said, men are seen as simply “obligation objects”.
Good for you and I would tell her as much. At least tell your friends guy yourself to run like hell before its too late. At this point, no matter how she gets pregnant (artificial insem., rape, some other boyfriend she has on the side) it will end up being the guys responsibility! No respecting male should ever stay with ANY female who is so one sided about such a life altering event effecting so many for 18 long years…