| Film Details | 27 - Secondary School - 16m 19s |
|---|---|
| Notes | |
| Age Rating | U (no particularly shocking footage) |
| Synopsis | The next stage in the attack on men in education; how secondary school continues the campaign to force boys out of education. Looks at how the curriculum has been modified to remove all elements that improve boys’ performance and the reaction from Feminists to any discussion of male intellectual strengths. • Harvard President Larry Summers on boys’ innate abilities • What do women bring to science? • Double-standards in the discussion of genetic abilities • How many female computing teachers could recognise a ZX81? • Why are women being excessively encouraged into technical careers? |
| Interviewees | Stephen Fitzgerald, National Organiser of the Mankind Initiative Men’s Charity. Erin Pizzey, Author and Domestic Violence expert. Opened the world’s first domestic violence shelter in London and is a patron of the Mankind Initiative Men’s Charity. Author of the book “Prone to Violence”. Richard Maudsley, Headteacher, Whitings Hill Primary School, London. All interviews recorded in 2004 |
In the event of any issue with playback, this film can also be found here.
I realise it is fashionable to attack religion these days however, at this site http://feeds2.feedburner.com/FocusOnTheFamilyDailyBroadcast some jaw dropping scientific evidence is presented that there are real biological differences between the way male and female brains operate. Scroll down to “Differences That Strengthen Marriage” to hear a Christian doctor explain scan results and what they mean.
Indeed. I’m of the belief that if we’re going to see Men’s Rights emphasized in the world, if we’re going to conquer feminism, it’s going to be through Faith first.
Ive only discovered this site very rescently.
Im blown away by it.
For the past 20 years or more Ive been watching with jaw dropping incredulity the denigration of anything male,masculine or macho.
The most memorable article was an article written by Zoe heller with a headline that said All men are wankers.and everybody thought this was ok and acceptable!!!!
I was in my late 20s at this stage so had some experience of a decade or so where it was perfectly ok to be male masculine or macho.But what about all the young boys that have been listening,viewing and reading such headlines for the past 20 years or more who have no idea what it is like to be ok to be male,amsculine or macho unless it is the feminised version which is changed daily and needs constant femenist approval.V sad and frightening.
I am and have been shocked and saddened that over all this time there hasant been one single male elected representative or male leader or male commentator that appears to have had or has the desire,the ability,the overwhelming urge or sense of survival to stand up to these feminist or defend everything male.
Until discovering this site that is.
Your site and videos have given me back confidence in my sense of judgement.
All the questioning of my masculinity ive been doing every time ive read feminised mainstream media and instinctively felt that these feminists cant be right. asking myself if im losing the plot here cos nobody appeared to question any of their crap and nobody appeared to defend anything male.
Your site and material is such a releif to me that it is ok to be male,masculine and macho as i instintively feel.Thank you very much.
mabey you could do a study of how the sisters in the BBC appear to be deliberately trying to feminise the BBC sports dept.up to about 2 years ago i found that mens sport on tv was the last place that i could watch in comfort knowing that it couldnt possibly be feminised.how wrong i was.as of now even mens rugby is being presented on tv by women and commentated on by women on bbc london.and it doesnt appear to be a problem for most men.mabey i have the problem.but after seeing your videos i have some hope that i dont.but what can be done.
why shouldnt there be somewhere left for men to be men.big red card to all these feminists i say.
Thanks for your comment and I’m glad to be making a noise about these things.
The invasion of male spaces like the rugby reporters you mention, and the UFC ring referees I have discussed, is part of the tyranny of Feminism. Women must be allowed their spaces and women only-sections of newspapers, and women-only gyms, but it is not ok for men to have exclusive areas of activity because this is deemed sexist.
This road has a lot farther to run but we must keep striving to believe in ourselves as men and see through the hype, as it were.
Do you know where I can get a “copy” of that Mallard Fillmore comic displayed in this video? Thanks in advance.
P.S.
While I do disagree, on occasion, with your dismissal of women (sometimes suggesting that NONE of them are capable of doing anything technical; although I know you don’t truly believe it, it comes off that way) I really appreciate the work you are doing.
I am an EXTREMELY rational thinker and could never understand why all of the other scientists I hang out with just seemed to blindly accept feminism without noticing the obvious rational inconsistencies that go along with it.
For example, why do feminists (this includes most “scientists” and other academics I’ve noticed) think it’s okay to try to pretend that discrimination against men doesn’t exist by changing the definition of discriminate. Or why do they feel it is morally okay to ignore a man who is being abused because he can’t do anything to defend himself (without going to jail)? Because they deserve it due to some perceived patriarchy? Because they benefit from it in the long run anyway? It is absolutely and completely illogical. It is pure vindictiveness. I feel like many of these women (or transsexuals) have been wronged by a man in their life and they wish to get revenge.
A friend of mine ended our friendship because I didn’t believe that people should be treated differently based on a theory of systemic oppression that is very complicated and difficult to definitively ascertain, especially when it’s no longer overt like it used to be. So, I tried to understand her reasoning and simply could not no matter how hard I tried.
The men that are feminists seem to just want to fit in with all of the other “intellectuals”. It’s funny how people in academia think that they aren’t like sheep when, in reality, they are in many respects just with more sophisticated ideas (i.e. feminism, socialism, etc.). They seem to all believe in pretty much the same things just for the sake of being part of the herd. Their identity is “liberal” and they feel they must adopt all “liberal” ideas. (I hate the labels liberal and conservative as I consider myself neither)
Furthermore, I think some realize they want equality of outcome because they are lacking. For example, the friend that ended our friendship had become a transsexual while she was in college (we didn’t talk). After this she apparently had a severe psychological breakdown (not to mention she had always been lazy). Now, either due to mental issues or laziness–probably mostly the latter–she refuses to continue her academic pursuits as a graduate student in physics or to get a job. She now lives with her parents at age 28 and will probably live their the rest of her life unless someone comes along to work for her (how ironic that she’s a feminist). I think it’s possible that she supports equality of outcome because, in general, that’s the only way she’ll be able to get ahead in life due to the aforementioned afflictions.
Anyway, that’s a long story for a short point: Most radical feminists have dishonest or superficial motives and equality of outcome should only be reserved for the most severe instances like severe physical disability.
One last thing. I think it would be a mistake to attempt to use religion as a reason for any of this. Not all anti-feminist men are religious (like me) and I just think it is irrational to base any movement on scripture or dogma of any sort. A woman doesn’t “belong at home with the kids” because a holy book implies it. A woman can do whatever she wants and should be treated the same as a man where it is possible to do so. Preferential treatment towards either sex is bullshit.
Thanks for all of your work. Hopefully we might be able to turn the tide and have REAL equality for all human beings.
And I’m an American if this helps you understand my liberal and conservative references.