| Film Details | 39 - Conclusion - 11m 20s |
|---|---|
| Notes | |
| Age Rating | U (no particularly shocking footage) |
| Synopsis | Looks at the impossibility of achieving equality as defined by Feminists. Equality of outcome is a logical impossibility when dealing with men and women. Suggests that the concept of “sexism” needs to be revisited. Men and women are different and we need to address these differences fairly rather than pretending that they don’t exist. • Massive discrimination against men in the pursuit of equality • How many girls grow up dreaming of becoming astronauts? • Government’s unrealistic approach to equality • The rise of women in the workplace • Is “diversity” overrated? • Sexism is not necessarily sexist • A permanent gender war |
| Interviewees | Angry Harry, Psychologist and Men’s Rights activist, angryharry.com. Simon, Psychologist and Writer. Erin Pizzey, Author and Domestic Violence expert. Opened the world’s first domestic violence shelter in London and is a patron of the Mankind Initiative Men’s Charity. Author of the book “Prone to Violence”. Oliver Curry, Evolutionary Psychologist at the London School of Economics and contributing author to Demos, the independent think tank and research institute. All interviews recorded in 2004 |





















In every matriachal society on earth the culture is almost stoneage. The women do disproportionate amounts of work while the men become indolent and aimless. However, the society never advances BECAUSE of the fact that those who could advance it are excluded from running it. Perhaps the best thing men as a gender could do is to go home and LET the women have it all. As the society then falls apart, women will be forced to admit that they are not capable of creating a forward moving society. Only then will reality hit home and we can all get back to sanity.
Failing this, men have to wake up to the fact that women have started a sex war and it is time we fought it instead of watching it. If the men show up to this war they will win it. The questions are, can we get men to show up and fight this war like any other?
That isnt that happens though, nobody will realize anything and nothing will be turned around. No civilization ever arrests it’s decline because of silly little things like the increasing obviousness of the stupidity of continueing with things as they are.
Women will never, NEVER, connect the dots and attribute their mounting misery to feminism, it just won’t happen. In their minds society is crumbling because men arent doing what they’re supposed to do, simple as that. They’ll never accept that this has to do with their own changed behaviour, it will always be ALL men’s fault, all the way back to caves and mud huts.
It’s hard to say. Not that I disagree per se, but how do you define a matriarchal society? If a society happens, say, to have a queen as it’s monarch, that doesn’t necessary mean that the society is matriarchal. I would say that Elizabethan England managed to defy the odds in spite of the Queen’s gender.
Look I’m not trying necessarily to dissuade you, but I am trying to paint an accurate picture. Often, when a Queen rules, there are men making sure things are managed. You don’t see women occupying the Privy Council in Queen Elizabeth’s time.
“Women actually think that work is about sitting at a keyboard and being emotional” lol… and they do, they live in a fantasy world, so when they have to face reality they just quit!
Oh, I’d say it’s worse.
They force reality to conform to them, rather than the other way around. If they want to be in the kind of jobs that earn high wages, but aren’t willing to make the sacrifices or perform to standards, they and their willing male collaborators force the change on the system itself. Rather than focus on effectiveness, efficacy, and excellence, they focus on equality.
Now…If I may ask, what do we focus on, if not Equality? I agree with Angry Harry (as I almost always do) that there is no balance to Equality, because men and women simply are not equal. What is the solution?
I have one: Excellence.
The Pursuit of Excellence does discriminate, but it discriminates in a way that is mutually beneficial to both genders. It ignores the gender war, because in this sense it cannot exist. Both genders are pursuing their paths to excellence based on their abilities and their merits. If a woman wants to be an astronaut, great- as long as she passes the same muster as the men do so they do not have to see her as a burden. I have no problem with this whatsoever.
I do have a problem with women being soldiers, sailors and marines (though not Airmen) because being one of these types of servicemen requires one to sublimate oneself to the group dynamic in order to be the most effective combat force. If a woman cannot pack 90lbs + of gear on her back and march 25 miles as well as I can (and I can do that quite well – twice in fact a day), then we cannot have her. Likewise, if she gets pregnant, that’s a problem! She’s suddenly non-deployable. While she may have joined the Army, her baby didn’t. Getting her out of operational theatre devotes resources in terms of time and manpower, as well as aircraft and seacraft space that could’ve been used for wounded or other military assets, to get her out of theatre.
On ships, it’s even worse. There are calls in the US Navy to allow women on submarines where they didn’t exist before. Again, now you have to retool the ships to allow a female-only bath facilities. I question the US Military’s decision on this: How does having women as servicemembers promote Excellence? You don’t see co-ed sports teams on the field, now do you?
I believe in the pursuit of Excellence, and it seems that certain Leftist forces seek to undermine that at every angle.