| Film Details | 33 - Male Chauvinism - 07m 45s |
|---|---|
| Notes | |
| Age Rating | 15 (strong footage/language, possibly including violence and sexual imagery) |
| Synopsis | On the myth of male chauvinism and reality of male nobility. • How “respect” is earned from subordinates and others • Toxicity of women in the military • Men’s protection of women through the ages |
| Interviewees | Stephen Fitzgerald, National Organiser of the Mankind Initiative Men’s Charity. Gavyn, Royal Marine Commando. All interviews recorded in 2004 |
Watch the Video!
Watch on YouTube!
Samples from the Documentary
Introduction
For the sacrifice of men
Download via File Sharing!
The documentary series is now available on the eDonkey file sharing network. Click here for the links!Support the Male Studies program
Recommended Books
by Erin Pizzey
The memoirs of a truly great campaigner for truth in the treatment of domestic violence.
by Warren Farrell, Phd
Highly enlightening and a strongly recommended read for men and women.
by Steve Moxon
An investigation into one of the key myths of our age: that women are oppressed by Patriarchy.
by Lionel Tiger
The First Look at an Unexpected New World for Men and Women.
by Michele Elliott
Shocking in its honesty - highlights the deep prejudice against men regarding child abuse.
by Neil Lyndon
Fascinating in-depth look at the rise of Feminism and its stranglehold over journalism and wider society.
Analysis of violent women proving that domestic violence is not a gender issue, from the direct experience of Erin Pizzey, the founder of the world's first women's domestic violence shelter.
Examination of inequality in men's healthcare provision in the UK by Professor Colin Francome, medical sociologist.
In “Save the Males”, author Richard Doyle examines the treatment of men in the modern era and presents a common sense approach to gender issues.
“What Men Know that Women Don't” by Rich Zubaty. A book that has helped tens of thousands of men and a couple thousand women too.Content
TOP Video
TOP Articles
Latest Comments
C Davison I am researching an essay on the last 100 years of history on the English working man & how his story is always in the... – Feb 06, 2:53 PM
manwomanmyth Cheers. What you say is true, but it's effect on the behaviour of men might not be so obvious. Most men will not become MGTOW.... – Feb 05, 3:32 PM
Chris Roubis The developers of WOT are in the business of selling security seals for websites, so they have a vested interest in making website owners afraid... – Feb 04, 3:16 PM
TFH MWM, Have you thought about going to Kickstarter, to get funding for your films? http://www.kickstarter.com/discover/categories/film%20&%20video?ref=sidebar A lot of little documentaries have gotten $10,000 in funding... – Feb 04, 4:02 AM
TFH That list is superb, and also shows unassailably why democracy has a life-cycle, after which a feminist police state follows. There is no other outcome... – Feb 04, 3:58 AM
Latest Registered Offenders

Katherine Heigl:
Bigot
Josefin von Zeipel Segerberg:
Bigot
Tracy Odell:
Bigot
Harriet Harman:
Corrupt Public Official
Nicole Fabian-Weber:
Bigot
Jenna Myers Karvunidis:
BigotTOP Links
Other Top Videos
Other Top Links
Articles of note
- Answering the Tired Feminist Mantra
- Feminism FAQ
- Gaea – exploring political organisms
- How to Avoid a False Rape Claim
- It is Time to Expose Misandry
- Men and Women FAQ
- Men Have Bred Dogs And Cattle. Why Not Women Too?
- On Big Government
- Sexbots
- The Feminist’s Guide To Debate Tactics
- The Fraud of Feminism
- The Misandry Bubble
- Warn men: Beware Christian marriage doublespeak and hair trigger for wife initiated divorce.
- Why Feminism is Illogical, Unnecessary, and Evil
Men's Movement
Child Abuse Hysteria
YouTube Channels
Misc Links
Categories
Archives
Search
-
No Copyright
Please feel free to link or copy any original content on this site.









One thing I notice about women that they have this strange sort of expectation, a sort of “tit-for-tat” kind of thing, where “I do this, so you do that,” kind of thing. I don’t know if anyone else has noticed this, but I’ve dated my share of women and they always demand this kind of thing, whereas men don’t really do that.
Men don’t play “tit-for-tat” all the time. We see a job that’s in our responsibility to do, and we do it. No fuss, no argument. Indeed, we often just do it without being told.
A case in point was my own mother trying to impose dishwashing duties on my Dad and me just because she cooked. Well, we would do it anyway, but that wasn’t the point. My Mom, I love her, but she applied this attitude to everything, and it turned out she can be a real slob because she thinks every activity she does should be equalized by an activity we do.
And I found she wasn’t the only one. Every woman I’ve ever gone out with felt the same way. She cooks, I clean. Where the hell is that written? When I cook, I clean. My current girlfriend was pleased that not only did I cook a fancy dinner (I have learned much from Food Network) but I cleaned afterward, and she felt that I needed special treatment as a reward.
But I stopped her.
Yes, I stopped her. Why?
Because I didn’t want her to reward me based on what I do for her, but if she loved me.
Sex and love shouldn’t be about a “give me this and I give you that” kind of thing, but a giving sort of arrangement that cherishes the person you love.
I observed similar behaviour with my sister. She would also constantly reduce her guilt when she would do something bad by referring to me. For example:
Dad: Why did you do this?
Sis: But he did X 2 weeks ago!
Where the hell does it come from? How come anything bad woman does is justified by some ancient wrongdoings of men? This stretches from my little sister to the women I dated. They are never the cause, it is always mans fault no matter how outlandish the connection is.
It’s worth looking into, I think. I don’t know where it comes from, but I suspect childhood had something to do with it.
However, what I also notice is that women, like men, like to see some positive results from the work they do. But it matters to them just how positive. With my mother, for instance, she felt that by virtue of her cooking that translates to us bearing some burden of the housework. Women use this kind of logic: If I love you, I do this, and if you love me you’ll do that.
Men, on the other hand, don’t see doing something necessarily as an act of love, but as something that needs to be done. When I see something that I want done, I do it, or have it gotten done somehow. When I lived with a roommate during the Army and in university, we never had this strange expectation. We cleaned when we did because it needed to be done; especially in the Army. Because if we had this sort of expectation of tit-for-tat in the Army, we would’ve been horribly chewed out by our superiors every time there was a room inspection because nothing would get done.
I wouldn’t necessarily call myself a neat-freak, but my sister can bring her newborn baby to my condo anytime and not be worried that he’ll catch a germ from walking around on my hardwood floors.
But I contrast that with some of the pig-sty’s some of my girlfriends have had. A lot of the reasons why I dumped a woman was because her bathroom was atrocious. I mean very gross. Where my toilets at my place are good enough to eat off of, I twice had to refuse to stay overnight at a girlfriend’s flat for fear of my own health. I can’t afford to be sick.
Sometimes I think women are just looking for some man to take care of them.