| Film Details | 18 - Child Abuse 1 - 28m 17s 18 - Child Abuse 2 - 28m 26s |
|---|---|
| Notes | This film has been split into 2 parts due to length and so there are 2 video players below. |
| Age Rating | 18 (very strong footage/language including violence) |
| Synopsis | Child Abuse 1: Exploration of child abuse – particularly physical and sexual – in the media and wider society. How men are singled out for blame and hysteria about abuse in the news. • The taboo subject of female sexual abuse of children • Typical image of a paedophile • NSPCC attacks on men • False accusations of sexual abuse made by women against men • Double-standard in reporting of sexual abuse and the application of law • The prevalence of abuse committed by mothers compared with fathers • Child abuse in the womb from mothers’ drinking, smoking and drug-taking Child Abuse 2: Further examination of female paedophiles looking at mothers who abuse. In depth look at some of the activities of the NSPCC and their attack on men and family. • Post-natal depression and it’s effects on men as well as women • The campaign of government and charities to divide men from children • The negative effects of denying children essential interaction with adults, particularly men • Why family is the key to child safety and not further child protection laws and services • More on child abuse in the womb from mothers’ drinking and smoking |
| Interviewees | Simon, Psychologist and Writer. Erin Pizzey, Author and Domestic Violence expert. Opened the world’s first domestic violence shelter in London and is a patron of the Mankind Initiative Men’s Charity. Author of the book “Prone to Violence”. [identity protected] Fireman, London Fire Brigade. This man’s identity has been disguised in order to protect him from sanction by his employer for speaking the truth about Fire Brigade policy with respect to equal opportunities. Andrew, IT Engineer and footballer. Michele Elliot, Director of Kidscape, a children’s charity, and author of the book “Female Sexual Abuse of Children”. Brian, Teacher and victim of domestic violence. Richard Maudsley, Headteacher, Whitings Hill Primary School, London. Mary Alabaster, Head of Maternal Mental Health, Essex Primary Healthcare Trust. Stephen Fitzgerald, National Organiser of the Mankind Initiative Men’s Charity. Angry Harry, Psychologist and Men’s Rights activist, angryharry.com. All interviews recorded in 2004 |
Child Abuse 1
In the event of any issue with playback, this film can also be found here.
Child Abuse 2
In the event of any issue with playback, this film can also be found here.
My best friend gets kicked out of his home by his stepmom everytime his dad leaves for business
Excellent, if depressing videos, though I will disagree with the “nuclear family” concept being “what nature intended”.
It seems clear to me that a close extended family is very important.
Indeed, close uncles, aunts, grandparents and cousins would make it extraordinarily difficult for abuse to go undetected
I agree that extended family is a huge benefit and almost vital. I should have said that at least dad and mum is essential, more family is even better.
See for example the recorded genealogies in the Holy Bible, for example Jesus. It lists the sons of fathers generation after generation. The system of removing the father is very strategically and precisely thought of to weaken society and brainwashed the women to cooperate in such an abuse. So historically a genealogy is traced from the family of the fathers. Therefore, removing the father would destroy the thousands of years of normal family values leaving children to gain their adaptability knowledge from the media and school. Single mothers, usually have no or little contact with their fathers and the fathers’ genealogy. Therefore, unfortunately most children learn from the media and school.
When you say single mothers generally have little or no contact with their fathers- do you mean their own fathers or the fathers of their children? Do you happen to know of a study related to this? Cheers
I really enjoyed the sections of these videos containing Michelle Elliot, she was both well-informed and well-spoken. Her rejection of Greer’s offensive comments was heartening, as was her frankness.