| Film Details | 19 - Fathers' Rights - 32m 22s |
|---|---|
| Notes | |
| Age Rating | 15 (strong footage/language, possibly including violence and sexual imagery) |
| Synopsis | Explores the lack of legal rights for fathers in the UK and the treatment of fathers in the family court. Also looks at the poor choices made by mothers and the use in law of the term “best interests of the child” to deny fathers adequate rights. • F4J • Fathers’ inadequate rights in what is often called a male-dominated society • Fathers’ lack of protection from the law and mothers’ disregard of the law |
| Interviewees | Stephen Fitzgerald, National Organiser of the Mankind Initiative Men’s Charity. Simon, Psychologist and Writer. Erin Pizzey, Author and Domestic Violence expert. Opened the world’s first domestic violence shelter in London and is a patron of the Mankind Initiative Men’s Charity. Author of the book “Prone to Violence”. Daniel Monk, Law Lecturer at Birkbeck University, London, and a specialist in Family law. Brian, Teacher and victim of domestic violence. Allan, Father and youth worker. All interviews recorded in 2004 |
In the event of any issue with playback, this film can also be found here.
The slimey law lecturer Daniel Monk summed up the legal professions’ attitude to Fathers; namely, he might be a rapist/violent man/serial child abuser, so just keep things as they are and let the mother decide if the Dad should see his kids-and of course, keep giving money to wankers like Daniel Monk in futile court battles. And as always, the mothers new men are totally ignored, they are all assumed fine, no questions asked-despite step fathers being the number one child abusers walking the planet.
The number one child abusers on the planet are mothers, especially single mothers. Otherwise, I agree with your synopsis.
I have always thought the best approach would be to assume married fathers to be heads of their families and wives to have consented to this in the wedding vows.. But then again, the femistate would not allow such vows to be made would it now?
Fathers do not generally have any desire to deny contact to mothers, unlike the scenario that seems common when mothers have all the power..
If women really want to have children as single mothers, and have all the power, they have always been able to do this.. Simply dont marry, or cohabit..
But the state is perversely incentivising and encouraging them to do this, even when they have previously agreed to raise children with their father in marraige..
The family courts should be totally abolished as a concept entirely, they are worse than useless, merely a vehicle to enrich parasitic lawyers whose incentives lie in creating the maximum adversity and moving as slowly as possible..
This serves the government whose aim is to break up families in order to be able to have more control of the parents and especially the children..
The childrens act shows how the state has now assumed itself to be the head of every family, and section 4 shows how it irradicates the traditional fathers role in marraige.
I do not recall any public demand for the state to take a fathers role, so this is clearly something that has been foisted upon us without our consent for the purpose of social engineering.
The expense is huge, which is why the state has to tax fathers an additional amount to their already high burden by its “child tax” which it calls “child support”.. However, child support is more like “chancellors support” as the main beneficiary is of course the state..
I see the most valid protest against the family courts and the state theft of our children as being for all affected parents to refuse to work and pay taxes to this vile entity, reject the courts entirely, starve the beast that is destroying our families.
Very well said.
Has anyone done any serious research on Fathers 4 Justice. It seems to me this organization was created to intentionally discredit the father’s rights movement. If
that is not the case it seems like the movement is being highjacked to discredit it and render it harmless.
1) Take for example some of the headlines written by leaders of fathers for justice. For example, “Not all fathers are bad,” a headline written by Fathers 4 Justice leader Dr. Pretorius. If that is not a statement loaded with assumptions, I don’t know what is. Can you imagine someone writing an a newspaper article with the headline “Not all moms are bad.”
http://www.roylaw.co.za/home/article/notalldadsarebadsaycapedcrusaders/pageid/children
2) The superhero costume antics seem intentionally designed to make fathers seem somewhat childish, crazy and unstable.
In my opinion Fathers 4 Justice is an organization designed or hijacked, in order to keep the the militaristic nature of men gently guided and dissipated into harmless pastures.
Can you imagine if Fathers 4 justice had a leader like Gerry Adams or Lord Wellington or Douglas MacArthur. Just imagine treason against men and children being punished according to the rules of these leaders:
Adams style disappearings of family judges; Adams style cell organization and one shot snipings of misandrous politicians and district and divorce attorneys.
Wellington style isolation and annihilation of entire brigades of divorce industry workers.
MacArthur “island hopping” as applied to the divorce industry. Destroying small pockets of feminism and the divorce industry one segment at at time until the leadership at the top was isolated.
As the video so profoundly points out, we men need leaders. We need to be lined up, organized, and ordered to defend our rights. We can’t do it without a leader. The powers that be know this. For any men’s movement that gains steam, the leader will be eliminated, discredited, or hijacked.
In a democratic society change is impossible because most men will vote the way their wife of girlfriend tells them to. That means always more than a 50% vote in favor of laws that empower women.
The only way to have a fair share as men is within a theocracy. We see this in the Islamic Countries.
I hope all men who have been through a Western Style Divorce and lost their children never speak a bad word against the Islamic Faith. I am Christian, and I know that without the Muslims, this Satanic rule by women would have engulfed the world already. I pray every day that the Muslims hold the line on this evil scourge.
Just research ex Fabian donations thief Matt O’connor that will tell you all you need to know. Now they have a silly buck teeth cow (his wife) running it who refused the father of her children access to his kids.
Completely outrageous, given that the two women acknowledge he was simply a sperm donor.
http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/01/02/sperm-donor-fights-attempts-to-force-him-to-pay-child-support-to-lesbian-couple/
Another interesting case where the man was charged with sexual assault because he poked holes in the condoms to get her pregnant. But you don’t here sexual assault being referenced when a woman lies about being on the pill.
http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/01/03/nova-scotia-man-who-poked-holes-in-condoms-in-attempt-to-get-girlfriend-pregnant-loses-sexual-assault-appeal/