| Film Details | 24 - Irresponsible Mothers - 31m 39s |
|---|---|
| Notes | |
| Age Rating | 15 (strong footage/language, possibly including violence and sexual imagery) |
| Synopsis | Addresses the selfish behaviour of many mothers that has led to fatherlessness, damage to children in the womb and other child abuse. Looks at the media presentation of fathers as irresponsible and “dead-beats” compared with society’s failure to call irresponsible mothers to account. • Fatherlessness and its effects on children’s safety and achievement • Foetal Alcohol Syndrome • Forced fatherhood • Child Support Agency (CSA) |
| Interviewees | Stephen Fitzgerald, National Organiser of the Mankind Initiative Men’s Charity. Angry Harry, Psychologist and Men’s Rights activist, angryharry.com. Simon, Psychologist and Writer. Oliver Curry, Evolutionary Psychologist at the London School of Economics and contributing author to Demos, the independent think tank and research institute. Michele Elliot, Director of Kidscape, a children’s charity, and author of the book “Female Sexual Abuse of Children”. Daniel Monk, Law Lecturer at Birkbeck University, London, and a specialist in Family law. Allan, Father and youth worker. Sarah Nelson, Head of Public Relations for the Samaritans suicide charity. All interviews recorded in 2004 |
In the event of any issue with playback, this film can also be found here.
A good ecample of a loving mum:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1330689/Portrait-VERY-modern-14-year-old-Tattoos-piercings-drinking-alcohol.html
This link taken from Paul Elam’s site is a good example of the lunatic’s controlling the asylum.
http://www.avoiceformen.com/2010/12/17/hanna-rosin-abusing-her-children-on-video/comment-page-1/#comment-10466
I’d like to watch this later but when I’m more awake due to length. This web site is so interesting it makes me want to keep reading instead of sleeping, potentially unhealthy, suggest readers work on organization habits, like 1 article per day.
Primary Care Giver: When dad was the parent who stayed at home to raise the babies, the importance of this ‘strange entity’ vanishes, as I and other men have found out the hard way.
I hear you and I know how it is. A rigged game is very hard to win.
Mangina’s such as Daniel Monk are responsible for much of the selfishness of the women and the mayhem in British society, discussed in this video series.
Needless to say his motives are identical to the businesses selling their products to the wealthier divorced women and evil feminist empires like the NSPCC and CafCass: $$$!
And also like those businesses: he doesn’t care one tick about ‘the best interest of the child’ or even the mother he is helping to totally bankrupt and destroy her child(ren)’s father.
As long as that mantra: ‘The best Interest of the Child’ prevails, parasites like him will only become more and more wealthy.
That smug contempt he showed when triumphantly answering your question about what ‘automatic’ rights fathers have? ‘They have the right to apply for the right to…’ That really INFURIATED me and I haven’t even been a victim of these Draconian and misandrist laws!
He ought to be shot with a ball of his own shit, before being disbarred!
Give me a used car dealer any day and they ARE parasites…