Why do irresponsible mothers get a pass when discussing the ‘Baby Mama’ phenomenon? Is it really only about the man? And are women ever responsible for anything?
Looks at Shawty Lo and the 10 women who had children with him and also mentions the case of a school girl who repeatedly punched a boy in the face in the UK.






















The media like to present things in the stereotyped way..
The public, see things quite differently though..
A bloke I know well has about 2 dozen kids with just over half a dozen women..
Somewhere along the line, he feels he got “typecast” and basically, the kids where all wanted by the mothers, but the mothers were perhaps a bit bonkers to say the least..
Well it seems it would be like that under the unquestioning cultural mantra of “my body, my choice” (but the man’s/states obligation). Irresponsibility and care free entitlement will continue to rise until self destruction or when the men’s movement has effectively countered it.
By the way, I sent you an email at the end of December relating to our previous exchange on the topic of male heritage which you wrote you were looking forward to. Do let me know if it didn’t arrive or got mislaid and I’ll be happy to resend a copy.
Not received. Please send again.
Ok, it’s sent to both your author and contact emails at MWM.
I love your videos. Including this one. They are such a slap in the face of the mass media. I just imagine those self obsessed self righteous female commentators in this vid being utterly mortified on watching this video response to them and their subconsciously assumed immunity to responsibility.
You seem to be rehashing the points in your original war on men series.
You said you had new stuff in the making. New points? Or new rehashes?
Don’t get me wrong, new examples and arguments to reinforce the same point is good, but new points are better!
Regarding new stuff, some wise man said ‘Patience is a virtue’, and he was right!
Also, see this from Stardusk.
I think the original works here stand well and cannot be topped..
This site stands tall above all others in the movement.
A one stop education for any MRA.
I think MWM should consider moving to the world of action for any future works..
After all “where else is there to go now?”.
No need to go down the road to more and more online articles for its own sake and ending up in the common MRM state of getting increasingly trivial topics etc..
The MRM is full of commentary, online yappery, videos and endless phallusophising..
And so many MRA’s seem to be wanting us to be led by divorced mothers it seems.. Or accusing us of misogyny if we would prefer men to run the mens movement..
The paradox of misandric MRA leaders has always baffled me..
MWM stands out in that regard as a true anti-misandrist.. One of the few examples I have ever seen in the cause..
Anyway, I am going into “MRM retirement” until I see some signs of the movement getting out of its current hopeless docile and passive “closed loop” position!
It’s almost as if the feminists have created the MRM to act as a safety valve that keeps men asheep while their “leaders” read them bedtime stories forever!
All the best to you MWM in your future endeavors..
Drex
You seem to pronounce your ‘retirement from the MRM’ on roughly a fortnightly bases, although this is the first time I’ve seen you do it here.
I have been retired from active service officially for as long our mate Dave Ellison ex f4j international co-ordinator has been, which is at least 5 years. Still, we pop out now and then whenever we see something promising we could assist in..
Keeping an eye on the online movement doesnt count for much in reality as you know tfb..
I love how in the end you call out President Obama, are women helpless like children or are they responsible adults? Again, equality when it suites them, in the mean time men pick up the slack and do all the grunt work, taking full responsibility and blame for the hard stuff.
One question that I always ask, and this since I’ve been dealing with women in combat in the military, which allows me to bring up male oppression a lot, is if it’s offensive to women or degrading, how is it offensive or degrading; in this case how is the show degrading to women? I bet the explanations are absurd, and that’s the thing no one ever probes, they stop at its offensive and degrading, but I always wonder: how!? I honestly have yet to receive sound answer when I ask the question.
Just to say, the 30,000 complaints against the broadcast of this show won’t be by independent complainers. Someone with power in the feminist group will have instructed their brainwashed masses to tantrum over it.